On 1/11/26 10:20, Richard Henderson wrote:
@@ -13644,6 +13655,7 @@ static abi_long do_syscall1(CPUArchState *cpu_env, int num, abi_long arg1,switch (num) { case TARGET_NR_epoll_pwait: + case TARGET_NR_epoll_pwait2: { sigset_t *set = NULL;@@ -13654,8 +13666,13 @@ static abi_long do_syscall1(CPUArchState *cpu_env, int num, abi_long arg1,} } - ret = get_errno(safe_epoll_pwait(epfd, ep, maxevents, timeout, - set, SIGSET_T_SIZE)); + if (num == TARGET_NR_epoll_pwait) { + ret = get_errno(safe_epoll_pwait(epfd, ep, maxevents, arg4, + set, SIGSET_T_SIZE)); + } else { + ret = get_errno(safe_epoll_pwait2(epfd, ep, maxevents, timeout_ts, + set, SIGSET_T_SIZE)); + }This second test needs to be vs pwait2, lest you break epoll_wait.
Bah, seconds later I noticed the switch in the context. r~
