On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 09:19:10AM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> On 13.01.26 21:56, Peter Xu wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 01:12:42PM -0500, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 02:58:09PM +0500, Alexandr Moshkov wrote:
> > > 
> > > Peter: Please review the migration aspects (especially the vmstates).
> > > Thank you!
> > 
> > Looks good from my side as long as it's based on VMSD, I appreciate that
> > change from the old versions where it used to use qemufile APIs.
> > 
> > The major question here is if this series depends on Vladimir's other
> > series
> 
> No, it does not. And if we can proceed with merging these series first, I'll
> be happy to rebase on top of it.

I thought it requires migrate_local_vhost_user_blk() be present?  The
inflight feature should not be enabled only if there's a hint that it's a
local migration..

I'll comment inline on the patch later.

> 
> > while there's still one patch that is not-for-merge:
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/#t
> > 
> > Does it automatically mark this series RFC as well?
> > 
> > Personally speaking, a new migration cap would work all fine, we should
> > have discussed it somewhere previously.  Said that, "local-vhost-user-blk"
> > capability is likely not the right one.  IMHO it should be either "local"
> > or "fd-passing" / "fd-passthrough" (or something generic) as the name.  If
> > we are not sure if we will leverage more than "passing the FDs around", we
> > can make it as simple as "local" as a new migration capability.
> > 
> > Then migration's misc.h should export a function migrate_is_local() then
> > device code can probe that in its own vmstate handling paths on save/load.
> > 
> > A note to Vladimir: please remember to add a check to enforce UNIX socket
> > when a formal patch 23 will be proposed some day, no matter what is the
> > name of the capability.  It should fail qmp "migrate" or qmp
> > "migrate_incoming" command if the main URI is not a unix socket.
> > 
> 
> Thanks! I'll keep that in mind when prepare next version.
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Vladimir
> 

-- 
Peter Xu


Reply via email to