On 1/21/26 19:17, Patrick Williams wrote:
A few entries in the catalina model were using the PCA9552 chip
because it was "close enough" in function.  Since there is a PCA9535
model now, switch to use it.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Williams <[email protected]>
---
  hw/arm/aspeed_ast2600_catalina.c | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/arm/aspeed_ast2600_catalina.c b/hw/arm/aspeed_ast2600_catalina.c
index 4edb30bb16..65495a524e 100644
--- a/hw/arm/aspeed_ast2600_catalina.c
+++ b/hw/arm/aspeed_ast2600_catalina.c
@@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ static void catalina_bmc_i2c_init(AspeedMachineState *bmc)
      /* i2c0mux1ch1 */
      /* io_expander7 - pca9535@20 */
      i2c_slave_create_simple(pca954x_i2c_get_bus(i2c_mux, 1),
-                            TYPE_PCA9552, 0x20);
+                            TYPE_PCA9535, 0x20);
      /* eeprom@50 */
      at24c_eeprom_init_rom(pca954x_i2c_get_bus(i2c_mux, 1), 0x50, 8 * KiB,
                            gb200io_eeprom, gb200io_eeprom_len);
@@ -497,7 +497,7 @@ static void catalina_bmc_i2c_init(AspeedMachineState *bmc)
      /* i2c0mux4ch1 */
      /* io_expander8 - pca9535@21 */
      i2c_slave_create_simple(pca954x_i2c_get_bus(i2c_mux, 1),
-                            TYPE_PCA9552, 0x21);
+                            TYPE_PCA9535, 0x21);
      /* eeprom@50 */
      at24c_eeprom_init_rom(pca954x_i2c_get_bus(i2c_mux, 1), 0x50, 8 * KiB,
                            gb200io_eeprom, gb200io_eeprom_len);


Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <[email protected]>

Thanks,

C.

Reply via email to