On 2/2/26, 9:07 AM, "Peter Xu" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> > The latest version was > > > > [PATCH v9 0/8] virtio-net: live-TAP local migration > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/[email protected] > > > > <mailto:[email protected]>/__;!!GjvTz_vk!T9a83fcFgNhv7DgAAfFINb-FE6knVp53t5c7XkCrY76jAhmGxZz42YqHIlPt-eV_hh7V-OksMeBMsw$ > > > > and I plan to post v10 soon. > Yes, thanks for re-raising this. If we have similar features being > proposed, we should always discuss whether we should stick with one of them > if that'll work for all. > IIUC Vladimir's solution looks indeed superior in that it has less > constraints, and also works for CPR mode. This was previously discussed here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ My impression from that discussion is that 1. Vladimir's solution has some extra complexity 2. We are trying to standardize cpr as the primary method for local migration, so the benefit of supporting non-cpr local transfers is slightly double edged That said, both solutions seem valid and Vladimir is doing good work in this area, so I'd be happy with either outcome in this case. Thanks, Ben
