On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 12:44:02AM +0800, Chao Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 01:17:55PM +0800, Max Chou wrote:
> > This patch adds support to disassemble Zvfofp4min instructions.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Max Chou <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  disas/riscv.c | 3 +++
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/disas/riscv.c b/disas/riscv.c
> > index daffe9917f..9abf86f2d7 100644
> > --- a/disas/riscv.c
> > +++ b/disas/riscv.c
> > @@ -987,6 +987,7 @@ typedef enum {
> >      rv_op_vfncvtbf16_sat_f_f_w = 956,
> >      rv_op_vfncvt_f_f_q = 957,
> >      rv_op_vfncvt_sat_f_f_q = 958,
> > +    rv_op_vfext_vf2 = 959,
> >  } rv_op;
> >  
> >  /* register names */
> > @@ -2260,6 +2261,7 @@ const rv_opcode_data rvi_opcode_data[] = {
> >      { "vfncvtbf16.sat.f.f.w", rv_codec_v_r, rv_fmt_vd_vs2_vm, NULL, 0, 0, 
> > 0 },
> >      { "vfncvt.f.f.q", rv_codec_v_r, rv_fmt_vd_vs2_vm, NULL, 0, 0, 0 },
> >      { "vfncvt.sat.f.f.q", rv_codec_v_r, rv_fmt_vd_vs2_vm, NULL, 0, 0, 0 },
> > +    { "vfext.vf2", rv_codec_v_r, rv_fmt_vd_vs2_vm, NULL, 0, 0, 0 },
> >  };
> >  
> >  /* CSR names */
> > @@ -3715,6 +3717,7 @@ static void decode_inst_opcode(rv_decode *dec, rv_isa 
> > isa)
> >                      case 12: op = rv_op_vclz_v; break;
> >                      case 13: op = rv_op_vctz_v; break;
> >                      case 14: op = rv_op_vcpop_v; break;
> > +                    case 22: op = rv_op_vfext_vf2; break;
> checkpatch reports:
> ERROR: trailing statements should be on next line
> 
> But this should be on next line" can be ignored (Patch 9 too). The existing 
> disas/riscv.c file
Correction: This is similar to the case in Patch 14. We can keep the current 
code style.

Thanks,
Chao
> consistently uses the single-line format:
>        case X: op = rv_op_xxx; break;
> 
> Maintaining consistency with the existing file style takes precedence here.
> 
> Other, LGTM.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Chao Liu <[email protected]>
> 
> Thanks,
> Chao
> >                      }
> >                      break;
> >                  case 20:
> > -- 
> > 2.52.0
> > 
> > 

Reply via email to