* Markus Armbruster ([email protected]) wrote: > "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <[email protected]> writes: > > [...] > > > I did see you suggesting for Rust for it; which would work - although > > given it wouldn't be performance sensitive, Python would seem reasonable. > > Marc-André suggested "Python or Rust (student choice)". > > Daniel argued for Rust "as it allows the possibility to embed that Rust > impl inside the current QEMU binaries, to fully replace the C code and > retain broadly the same functionality." > > If we're not interested in such embedding, then Python feels preferable > to me, because I'd expect it to get us to the finish line faster.
Ah ok, the either-or embedding thing sounds neat; but does sound like it would complicate stuff. Dave -- -----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code ------- / Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux | Happy \ \ dave @ treblig.org | | In Hex / \ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/
