On Friday, 13 February 2026 22:53:40 CET Andrey Erokhin wrote: > On 11/02/2026 19:07, Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > > On Tuesday, 10 February 2026 10:45:09 CET Andrey Erokhin wrote: > >> (BTW, is it OK that there is no fmode/dmode processing in system/vl.c?) > > > > You mean error handling of these options. Well, earlier error handling on > > one hand might be more desirable, but OTOH it might also be more > > complicated to be handled in vl.c than either in 9p.c or 9p-local.c I > > guess. > I mean dmode/fmode do not reach 9p-local.c, at least when used in `-virtfs > local,...`
Oh, didn't notice. All parameters in general are supposed to work both with the long form -fsdev ... -device, as well as with short form -virtfs. /Christian
