On Mon, 16 Feb 2026 at 08:58, Shameer Kolothum Thodi
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Nicolin Chen <[email protected]>
> > Sent: 13 February 2026 22:19
> > To: Shameer Kolothum Thodi <[email protected]>
> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
> > [email protected]; [email protected]; Nathan Chen
> > <[email protected]>; Matt Ochs <[email protected]>; Jiandi An
> > <[email protected]>; Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]>;
> > [email protected]; [email protected];
> > [email protected]; Krishnakant Jaju <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] hw/arm/smmuv3-accel: Allocate vEVENTQ for
> > accelerated SMMUv3 devices
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 13, 2026 at 10:39:40AM +0000, Shameer Kolothum wrote:
> > >  static MemTxResult smmu_writel(SMMUv3State *s, hwaddr offset,
> > >                                 uint64_t data, MemTxAttrs attrs)  {
> > > -    Error *local_err = NULL;
> > > +    Error *err = NULL, *local_err = NULL;
> > >
> > >      switch (offset) {
> > >      case A_CR0:
> > >          s->cr[0] = data;
> > >          s->cr0ack = data & ~SMMU_CR0_RESERVED;
> > >          /* in case the command queue has been enabled */
> > > -        smmuv3_cmdq_consume(s, &local_err);
> > > +        smmuv3_cmdq_consume(s, &err);
> > > +        /* Allocate vEVENTQ if EVENTQ is enabled and a vIOMMU is 
> > > available
> > */
> > > +        smmuv3_accel_alloc_veventq(s, &local_err);
> > > +        error_propagate(&err, local_err);
> >
> > It would be cleaner to have:
> >
> >      Error *local_err2 = NULL;
> >      Error *local_err = NULL;
>
> Yeah. I had a bit of back and forth on this. My thinking was to use err as
> an accumulating error pointer in case additional error paths are added
> later, with local_err_x used for intermediate calls.
>
> Either way is fine I guess for now.

Generally speaking we should try to stick to one of the
defined standard patterns for Error handling in the
big comment in include/qapi/error.h.

Yours is the "receive and accumulate multiple errors" pattern, I think?
That works, but do you really want to throw away the second error
message without reporting it if both calls fail?

Plus, from the commit message:

> Also, rename the local error variable and refactor smmu_writel() to use
> a single error accumulator with error_propagate().

If you find yourself writing "Also, ..." in a commit message,
it's often a sign that you should consider splitting the
commit in two.

thanks
-- PMM

Reply via email to