On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 at 15:24, Thomas Huth <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 12/02/2026 16.12, Peter Maydell wrote: > > The top-level test python scripts in tests/functional are supposed to > > be marked executable; "make check-functional" doesn't care about > > this, but it allows them to be run as standalone executables to > > exercise a single test, as docs/devel/testing/functional.rst > > describes. > > > > A couple of files have got into the tree without the executable > > bit set: fix them. > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <[email protected]> > > --- > > tests/functional/arm/test_aspeed_ast1060.py | 0 > > tests/functional/ppc/test_ppe42.py | 0 > > 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > mode change 100644 => 100755 tests/functional/arm/test_aspeed_ast1060.py > > mode change 100644 => 100755 tests/functional/ppc/test_ppe42.py > > > > diff --git a/tests/functional/arm/test_aspeed_ast1060.py > > b/tests/functional/arm/test_aspeed_ast1060.py > > old mode 100644 > > new mode 100755 > > diff --git a/tests/functional/ppc/test_ppe42.py > > b/tests/functional/ppc/test_ppe42.py > > old mode 100644 > > new mode 100755 > > Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <[email protected]>
Thanks; I've picked this up into target-arm.next since I'm assembling a pullreq, unless you would prefer to take it some other route. -- PMM
