On 2/26/26 12:30 AM, Florian Hofhammer wrote:
On 25/02/2026 18:30, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
On 2/25/26 8:21 AM, Florian Hofhammer wrote:
On 24/02/2026 16:52, Florian Hofhammer wrote:
The test executes a non-existent syscall, which the syscall plugin
intercepts and redirects to a clean exit.
Due to architecture-specific quirks, the architecture-specific Makefiles
require setting specific compiler and linker flags in some cases.

Signed-off-by: Florian Hofhammer <[email protected]>
---
   tests/tcg/arm/Makefile.target                 |  6 +++++
   tests/tcg/hexagon/Makefile.target             |  7 +++++
   tests/tcg/mips/Makefile.target                |  6 ++++-
   tests/tcg/mips64/Makefile.target              | 15 +++++++++++
   tests/tcg/mips64el/Makefile.target            | 15 +++++++++++
   tests/tcg/mipsel/Makefile.target              | 15 +++++++++++
   tests/tcg/multiarch/Makefile.target           | 22 ++++++++++++++--
   .../{ => plugin}/check-plugin-output.sh       |  0
   .../{ => plugin}/test-plugin-mem-access.c     |  0
   .../plugin/test-plugin-skip-syscalls.c        | 26 +++++++++++++++++++
   tests/tcg/plugins/syscall.c                   |  6 +++++
   tests/tcg/sparc64/Makefile.target             | 16 ++++++++++++
   12 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
   create mode 100644 tests/tcg/mips64/Makefile.target
   create mode 100644 tests/tcg/mips64el/Makefile.target
   create mode 100644 tests/tcg/mipsel/Makefile.target
   rename tests/tcg/multiarch/{ => plugin}/check-plugin-output.sh (100%)
   rename tests/tcg/multiarch/{ => plugin}/test-plugin-mem-access.c (100%)
   create mode 100644 tests/tcg/multiarch/plugin/test-plugin-skip-syscalls.c
   create mode 100644 tests/tcg/sparc64/Makefile.target

diff --git a/tests/tcg/multiarch/plugin/test-plugin-skip-syscalls.c 
b/tests/tcg/multiarch/plugin/test-plugin-skip-syscalls.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..1f5cbc3851
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/tcg/multiarch/plugin/test-plugin-skip-syscalls.c
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+/*
+ * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+ *
+ * This test attempts to execute an invalid syscall. The syscall test plugin
+ * should intercept this.
+ */
+#include <stdint.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
+
+void exit_success(void) __attribute__((section(".redirect"), noinline,
+                                       noreturn, used));
+
+void exit_success(void) {
+    _exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
+}
+
+int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
+    long ret = syscall(0xc0deUL);
+    if (ret != 0L) {
+        perror("");
+    }
+    /* We should never get here */
+    return EXIT_FAILURE;
+}

I'm running into an issue for all four variants of MIPS if I don't
hardcode the section but pass the function address as a syscall argument
and then use that as jump target in the plugin: according to the ABI,
the t9 register has to contain the address of the function being called.
The function prologue then calculates the gp register value (global
pointer / context pointer) based on t9, and derives the new values of t9
for any callees from gp again. As I'm currently just updating the pc
with the new API function, t9 is out of sync with the code after control
flow redirection and the binary crashes.
I think it is fair to expect a user of the API to be aware of such
pitfalls (or we can document it), but I'd of course still like to make
the tests pass. The simplest solution (theoretically) is to also set the
t9 register in the plugin callback before calling qemu_plugin_set_pc.
However, the MIPS targets do not actually expose any registers to
plugins, i.e., qemu_plugin_get_registers returns an empty GArray.


A lot of things can go wrong when jumping to a different context than the current one, 
that's why setjmp/longjmp exist. You can always add a comment for this "This 
function only changes pc and does not guarantee other registers representing context will 
have a proper value when updating it".

A reason why I pushed for using value labels, was to stay in the same context, 
and avoid the kind of issues you ran into.

Given this behavior, I see two solutions:
1) skipping the test on MIPS, or
2) making the test code a bit more contrived to use labels within the
     same function while preventing the compiler from optimizing the
     labels away (which it does even with -O0). I've got a prototype for
     this, but the test code looks a bit contrived then:

     int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
         int retvals[] = {EXIT_SUCCESS, EXIT_FAILURE};
         int retval_idx = 1;

         long ret = syscall(0xc0deUL, &&good);
         if (ret < 0) {
             perror("");
             goto bad;
         } else if (ret == 0xdeadbeefUL) {
             /*
              * Should never arrive here but we need this nevertheless to 
prevent
              * the compiler from optimizing away the label. Otherwise, the 
compiler
              * silently rewrites the label value used in the syscall to another
              * address (typically pointing to right after the function 
prologue).
              */
             printf("Check what's wrong, we should never arrive here!");
             assert(((uintptr_t)&&good == (uintptr_t)ret));
             /* We should absolutely never arrive here, the assert should 
trigger */
             goto good;
         }

     bad:
         retval_idx = 1;
         goto exit;
     good:
         retval_idx = 0;
     exit:
         return retvals[retval_idx];
     }

Maybe I'm just missing something obvious, I'd be happy to get some
feedback on this. Thanks in advance!


Can you post the exact code you had where labels are optimized away?
On which arch was it?

This happens across architectures but I've verified with x86, aarch64,
and riscv64. Below the C code and generated assembly, compiled with gcc
-O0 -o test.s -S test.c (adding -fno-dce and -fno-tree-dce does not
change anything and they should be included in -O0 anyway):

test.c:
     #include <stdlib.h>
     #include <unistd.h>

     int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {

         syscall(4096, &&good);
         return EXIT_FAILURE;
     good:
         return EXIT_SUCCESS;

     }

test.s:
         .file  "test.c"
         .text
         .globl main
         .type  main, @function
     main:
     .LFB6:
         .cfi_startproc
         pushq  %rbp
         .cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
         .cfi_offset 6, -16
         movq   %rsp, %rbp
         .cfi_def_cfa_register 6
         subq   $16, %rsp
         movl   %edi, -4(%rbp)
         movq   %rsi, -16(%rbp)
     .L2:
         leaq   .L2(%rip), %rax
         movq   %rax, %rsi
         movl   $4096, %edi
         movl   $0, %eax
         call   syscall@PLT
         movl   $1, %eax
         leave
         .cfi_def_cfa 7, 8
         ret
         .cfi_endproc
     .LFE6:
         .size  main, .-main
         .ident "GCC: (GNU) 15.2.1 20260209"
         .section       .note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits

As you can see, the "good" label and correspondingly the second return
are optimized away, and the compiler replaces the syscall argument
&&good with the address of the .L2 assembly label. This effectively then
causes an infinite loop of the syscall being called over and over again
and redirecting the PC to right after the function prologue.
The assembly output for aarch64 and riscv64 is analogous.


yes, that's the effect of noreturn attribute. Luckily, gcc is not "smart enough" at O0 to propage this attribute through function calls.

I tried something similar but didn't see the second one disappear.

I wonder if it's related to compiler detecting g_assert_not_reached() is a "noreturn" 
function, thus it doesn't expect to go past it, and eliminates dead code. You can try with 
assert(0) or moving g_assert_not_reached() to another function "crash()" instead, that is 
not marked as noreturn.

As I mentioned above, even turning off dead code elimination didn't
resolve the issue. But this was actually a good pointer nevertheless:
just wrapping the exit in a separate function like below solves the
issue. It's just that the compiler detected that the label is after a
return and deemed it unreachable (obviously not knowing about the
semantics of the syscall).  Below is the modified code that works across
architectures and that I'll use in the end:

     void exit_failure(void) {
         _exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
     }

     void exit_success(void) {
         _exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
     }

     int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
         syscall(4096, &&good);
         exit_failure();
     good:
         exit_success();
     }


As mentioned in another comment, you might prefer to have something like:

```
void test_from_syscall() {
          syscall(4096, &&good);
          exit_failure();
      good:
          return;
}

void test_from_sighandler() {
...
}

void test_from_instruction() {
...
}

/* So we can combine all tests in a single one */
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
test_from_syscall();
test_from_sighandler();
test_from_instruction();
}
```

If that's too complicated for any reason, feel free to have 3 different tests. It's just nicer to have this, but not mandatory.


Best regards,
Florian

Regards,
Pierrick

Regards,
Pierrick

Reply via email to