On Fri, 27 Feb 2026 at 18:57, Fabiano Rosas <[email protected]> wrote: > > Peter Maydell <[email protected]> writes: > > > Running "make check" with the clang leak sanitizer reveals some > > leak reports which are either not our problem or else not > > a leak which is worth our time to fix. Add some suppressions > > for these. > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <[email protected]> > > Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <[email protected]> > > FYI, mine has these. The first one is on my list to fix once I find some > time. The last two seem to be part of the stack for the ones you added > here. > > leak:qcrypto_tls_session_push > leak:gnutls_handshake > leak:memory_region_do_init > leak:qos_traverse_graph > leak:qdev_get_named_gpio_list
qdev_get_named_gpio_list is definitely used in paths other than the qemu_irq_intercept_in one we want to hit. I think that recent memory region fixes ought to have fixed the ones you're suppressing with memory_region_do_init. I couldn't make any sense of the qos_traverse_graph/walk_path one: it seems to be related to the qtest "subprocess" functionality somehow and doesn't repro without that. thanks -- PMM
