On 9/3/26 15:51, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Mon, 9 Mar 2026 at 14:21, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <[email protected]> wrote:
On 8/3/26 14:25, Peter Maydell wrote:
Marc-André Lureau (4):
tests: fix leaks in dbus-display-test
ui/dbus: fix leak regression
ui/dbus: fix Unix.Map proxy leak
ui/dbus: fix pixman cleanup
tests/qtest/dbus-display-test.c | 9 +++++++++
ui/dbus-listener.c | 11 +++++------
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
I don't know the code well enough to review more than the
two really obvious ones, but this series fixes all the leaks I
see in the dbus-display-test test.
Is this statement equivalent to:
Tested-by: Peter Maydell <[email protected]>
I thought about that, but I decided against it, because
I have not tested the actual dbus functionality at all;
I only ran 'make check'. For all I know the tests could have
fixed the leaks and broken something for users :-)
OK. I'll queue this series then, thanks!
