On 09/03/2026 15.00, Matthew Rosato wrote:
On 3/8/26 8:35 PM, [email protected] wrote:
From: Jared Rossi <[email protected]>
This patch series introduces an IPLB subtype to support PCI devices, which may
be built if a device has been assigned a boot index and is identified as a PCI
device with a corresponding s390 PCI Bus device.
Boot support is only added for virtio-blk-pci at this time and is limited to
devices with an assigned bootindex.
A "loadparm" property is added to virtio-blk-pci boot devices on s390x.
A simple test to check basic functionality is added to the cdrom-tests in qtest.
Changes v4 -> v5:
- Fix incorrect switch/case for virtio block device ID
- Use target_s390x() instead of qemu_arch_available(QEMU_ARCH_S390X)
- Properly denote switch fallthrough
- Remove reduntant RC checks in PCI read/write
Rather than reply to individual patches, I noticed new copyright lines with
2025 dates on the following patches that should be updated to 2026:
6: pc-bios/s390-ccw: Split virtio-ccw and generic virtio
8: pc-bios/s390-ccw: Introduce CLP Architecture
10: pc-bios/s390-ccw: Introduce PCI device
11: pc-bios/s390-ccw: Introduce virtio-pci functions
Thomas, if there are no further comments would you still like Jared to respin
for that kind of change or would you just fix up when you pick up the series?
I've seen different opinions on the year in copyright statements in the past
(also from various people from IBM) - some say, it should be the year when
the code was written/initially posted, some say, it should be the year when
the code gets merged ... I personally don't mind too much anymore. For me,
it's also ok if we keep the 2025.
Anyway, tomorrow (Tuesday) is softfreeze, so I'm going to send a pull
request for this series tomorrow - let me know by then if you want me to fix
up the year, or if you rather prefer to keep 2025.
Thomas
