On Tue, 17 Mar 2026, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
Rename the display and graphic console public functions to follow a consistent qemu_console_ (or qemu_graphic_console_) naming convention.The previous API used a mix of prefixes: dpy_, graphic_hw_, graphic_console_, console_has_, and update_displaychangelistener(). Unify them under a common qemu_console_ namespace for better discoverability and consistency. The main renames are: - dpy_gfx_*() / dpy_text_*() / dpy_gl_*() → qemu_console_*() - dpy_{get,set}_ui_info() → qemu_console_{get,set}_ui_info() - graphic_hw_*() → qemu_console_hw_*() - graphic_console_*() → qemu_graphic_console_*() - console_has_gl() → qemu_console_has_gl() - update_displaychangelistener() → qemu_console_listener_set_refresh()
Is the qemu_ prefix really needed here or if so would something shorter like qcon_ do instead of qemu_console_? With short line limits long names cause a lot of line wraps. I think just console_ as already used by some of these already would do and be less churn but no strong opinion on any of these.
Regards, BALATON Zoltan
