On 25 June 2012 15:43, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: > Am 25.06.2012 16:10, schrieb Peter Maydell: >> On 25 June 2012 14:48, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: >>> Thus I would suggest TARGET_PRIdPHYSADDR, also addressing Eric's >>> comment. Judging from patches 2-4 it's not used to frequently unlike its >>> user TARGET_FMT_plx, so we don't have to badly shorten it for usability. >> >> The hope is that it is used more extensively in the future (ie >> any device that would have used TARGET_FMT_plx should use these >> instead); I think TARGET_PRIdPHYSADDR is too long. > > Well, PRI*PHYSADDR would be another option, reasoning: > target_ | phys_addr | _t --- int_ | least64 | _t (PRI*LEAST64) > Or maybe PRI*PHYS since int is dropped, too? > > Point is, POSIX keeps the part after PRIx readable or at least > corresponding to the type name
Right. How about TARGET_PRI*PHYS, then? -- PMM
