On 26.06.2012, at 04:24, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) wrote: > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 07:32:39PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: >> When forwarding a segmentation fault into the guest process, we were passing >> the host's address directly into the guest process's signal descriptor. >> >> That obviously confused the guest process, since it didn't know what to make >> of the (usually 32-bit truncated) address. Passing in g2h(address) makes the >> guest process a lot happier. > > Passing g2h or h2g? From the context and code, I think h2g should make more > sense.
Yeah, it's s/g2h/h2g/g in all of the patch description and subject :). The patch is correct though. Alex
