Avi Kivity wrote:
Paul Brook wrote:
Yes, good thinking, but this should only be done if it actually impacts
something. Reducing overhead from 0.1% to 0.05% is not worthwhile
if it
introduces extra complexity.
If the overhead is that small, why are we touching this code in the
first place?
Accuracy is much more important from my point of view. Also, the
reduction in the number of signals delivered when the guest uses 100Hz
is significant.
You'd also get better battery life on laptops.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
