> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Auger <[email protected]>
> Sent: 07 May 2026 18:24
> To: Shameer Kolothum Thodi <[email protected]>; qemu-
> [email protected]; [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Nicolin
> Chen <[email protected]>; Nathan Chen <[email protected]>; Matt
> Ochs <[email protected]>; Jiandi An <[email protected]>; Jason Gunthorpe
> <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> [email protected]; Krishnakant Jaju <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 26/31] hw/arm/tegra241-cmdqv: Limit queue size
> based on backend page size
> 
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
> 
> 
> Hi Shameer,
> 
> On 4/15/26 12:55 PM, Shameer Kolothum wrote:
> > From: Nicolin Chen <[email protected]>
> >
> > CMDQV HW reads guest queue memory in its host physical address setup via
> > IOMMUFD. This requires the guest queue memory is not only contiguous in
> > guest PA space but also in host PA space. With Tegra241 CMDQV enabled,
> we
> > must only advertise a CMDQS that the host can safely back with physically
> s/a CMDQS/ a command queue size (CMDQS)
> > contiguous memory. Allowing a queue larger than the host page size could
> a queue size
> > cause the hardware to DMA across page boundaries, leading to faults.
> >
> > Walk the RAMBlock list to find the smallest memory-backend page size, then
> > limit IDR1.CMDQS so the guest cannot configure a command queue that
> exceeds
> what is the minimal CMDQS required?

AFAICS, spec doesn't specify a minimum. But in practical terms I think,
it will be 4K page size(CMDQS=8).

> > that contiguous backing. Fall back to the real host page size if no
> > memory-backend RAM blocks are found.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Shameer Kolothum <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  hw/arm/tegra241-cmdqv.c | 41
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/arm/tegra241-cmdqv.c b/hw/arm/tegra241-cmdqv.c
> > index af68add2f0..2870886783 100644
> > --- a/hw/arm/tegra241-cmdqv.c
> > +++ b/hw/arm/tegra241-cmdqv.c
> > @@ -14,6 +14,9 @@
> >  #include "hw/arm/smmuv3.h"
> >  #include "hw/core/irq.h"
> >  #include "smmuv3-accel.h"
> > +#include "smmuv3-internal.h"
> > +#include "system/ramblock.h"
> > +#include "system/ramlist.h"
> >  #include "tegra241-cmdqv.h"
> >  #include "trace.h"
> >
> > @@ -646,9 +649,38 @@ free_viommu:
> >      return false;
> >  }
> >
> > +static size_t tegra241_cmdqv_min_ram_pagesize(void)
> shouldn't we put that rather in system/physmem.c
> there we also have qemu_ram_pagesize_largest() for instance

Could do. But we may have to rename it differently compared to 
qemu_ram_pagesize_largest() as we are checking the size among
memory-backend RAM only.

May be qemu_ram_backend_pagesize_min() ?

Thanks,
Shameer

Reply via email to