On 5/8/26 19:54, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
+#define TYPE_TARGET_INFO_TARGET TYPE_TARGET_INFO"-"TARGET_NAME
I guess avoiding TARGET_NAME can wait until we actually build a single binary.
+typedef struct TargetInfoQomTarget {
+ TargetInfoQom parent;
+} TargetInfoQomTarget;
+
+typedef struct TargetInfoQomTargetClass {
+ TargetInfoQomClass parent_class;
+} TargetInfoQomTargetClass;
+
+OBJECT_DECLARE_TYPE(TargetInfoQomTarget, TargetInfoQomTargetClass,
TARGET_INFO_TARGET)
Since neither the object nor class are actually used; you don't need these.
+static void target_info_qom_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, const void * data) \
+{ \
+ TargetInfoQomTargetClass *klass = TARGET_INFO_TARGET_CLASS(oc); \
+ klass->parent_class.target_info = &ti_var; \
+} \
This belongs in vl.c as target_info_parent_type.class_base_init.
+static const TypeInfo target_info_qom_target_type_info = { \
+ .name = TYPE_TARGET_INFO_TARGET, \
+ .parent = TYPE_TARGET_INFO, \
+ .instance_size = sizeof(TargetInfoQomTarget), \
+ .class_size = sizeof(TargetInfoQomTargetClass), \
+ .class_init = target_info_qom_class_init, \
+ .abstract = false, \
+}; \
This reduces to just name, parent, and class_data.
You don't need sizes, class_init, or abstract.
r~
