From: Nguyen Dinh Phi <[email protected]>

Currently, the readline_insert_char() function is guarded by the cursor
position (cmd_buf_index) rather than the actual buffer fill level(cmd_buf_size).
The current check is:
        if (rs->cmd_buf_index < READLINE_CMD_BUF_SIZE)

This logic is flawed because if the command buffer is full and a user moves the
cursor backward (e.g. by sending left arrow key), cmd_buf_index can be
decreased without descreasing of buffer size.
This allow subsequent insertions to increase cmd_buf_size past its maximum
limit of rs->cmd_buf.

Because in the ReadLineState struct, cmd_buf[READLINE_CMD_BUF_SIZE + 1] is
immediately followed by the cmd_buf_index integer, once the buffer size is
sufficiently inflated, the memmove() operation inside readline_insert_char()
can write past the end of cmd_buf[] and overwrites cmd_buf_index itself.

The subsequent line:
        rs->cmd_buf[rs->cmd_buf_index] = ch;

then writes the input character to an address determined by the now-corrupted
index.

By providing a specifically crafted input sequence via HMP, this flaw can be
used to redirect the write operation to overwrite any field within the
ReadLineState structure, which can lead to unpredictable behavior or
application crashes.

Fix this by adding the guard to check for buffer fullness.

Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Nguyen Dinh Phi <[email protected]>
Message-id: [email protected]
Reviewed-by: Marc-AndrĂ© Lureau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 4e4832dd72db59cf9348a5cb787fe65b738d7601)
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <[email protected]>

diff --git a/util/readline.c b/util/readline.c
index 0f19674f52..e2664e48ca 100644
--- a/util/readline.c
+++ b/util/readline.c
@@ -84,7 +84,9 @@ static void readline_update(ReadLineState *rs)
 
 static void readline_insert_char(ReadLineState *rs, int ch)
 {
-    if (rs->cmd_buf_index < READLINE_CMD_BUF_SIZE) {
+    assert(rs->cmd_buf_index <= rs->cmd_buf_size);
+
+    if (rs->cmd_buf_size < READLINE_CMD_BUF_SIZE) {
         memmove(rs->cmd_buf + rs->cmd_buf_index + 1,
                 rs->cmd_buf + rs->cmd_buf_index,
                 rs->cmd_buf_size - rs->cmd_buf_index);
-- 
2.47.3


Reply via email to