On 11/05/2026 22:30, Peter Xu wrote:
> We wanted to remove RDMA migration once but that didn't go further.  In
> reality, with the help of Zhijian it's in Odd Fixes stage, even if we just
> merged one new parameter for it, for performance improvements.
> 
> Markus pointed out we'd better have at least one M: for it to match
> anything that is not orphaned.
> 
> Remove the X: for Migration entry for RDMA files, then it'll start to cover
> RDMA migration again. Keep the separate entry so Zhijian can keep getting
> copied, and copy the M:s over to say someone is collecting patches.
> Logically these M:s aren't needed after removing X:, but make it clearer.
> 
> Link: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
> Cc: Zhijian Li (Fujitsu) <[email protected]>
> Cc: Markus Armbruster <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <[email protected]>

thanks,

Acked-by: Li Zhijian <[email protected]>


> ---
>   MAINTAINERS | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 9d3d645953..c57ef413ca 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -3758,11 +3758,11 @@ F: docs/devel/migration/
>   F: qapi/migration.json
>   F: tests/migration-stress/
>   F: util/userfaultfd.c
> -X: migration/rdma*
>   
>   RDMA Migration
> +M: Peter Xu <[email protected]>
> +M: Fabiano Rosas <[email protected]>
>   R: Li Zhijian <[email protected]>
> -R: Peter Xu <[email protected]>
>   S: Odd Fixes
>   F: migration/rdma*
>   F: scripts/rdma-migration-helper.sh

Reply via email to