Am 13.05.2026 um 13:59 hat Daniel P. Berrangé geschrieben: > v1: https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2025-10/msg01650.html > v2: https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2026-01/msg02083.html > v3: https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2026-01/msg02939.html > v4: https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2026-02/msg03245.html > v5: <...somewhere...mailman is dead again at time of sending...> > > The recent (at the time of v1) set of regressions identified in the LUKS > block driver re-inforced that despite having a hugely useful set of I/O > tests, our CI coverage is still letting through too many bugs. > [...]
I reviewed the patches directly related to qemu-iotests. One general remark I have about this series is that the commit subject lines often refer to "tests" when they actually only mean "iotests" (which is the common subject line prefix for qemu-iotests changes) instead of all tests. This makes the lines sometimes a bit confusing, so I'd suggest to change them. For the other patches more related to CI and the build system in general, I had a look at them and agree with them/their commit messsage, but didn't fully review them. For anything I didn't comment on, you can add: Acked-by: Kevin Wolf <[email protected]>
