J. Neuschäfer <[email protected]> writes: > "devices have an two additional [...]" -> "devices have two additional", > and also a case of "were" vs. "where". > > Signed-off-by: J. Neuschäfer <[email protected]> > --- > docs/devel/qom.rst | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/docs/devel/qom.rst b/docs/devel/qom.rst > index > 5870745ba27b108726da0756aa2b90109d5e0bd6..935bb1004a7839c8e963985e765c866d5b980c53 > 100644 > --- a/docs/devel/qom.rst > +++ b/docs/devel/qom.rst > @@ -435,14 +435,14 @@ OBJECT_DEFINE_ABSTRACT_TYPE() macro can be used instead: > Device Life-cycle > ================= > > -As class initialisation cannot fail devices have an two additional > +As class initialisation cannot fail, devices have two additional > methods to handle the creation of dynamic devices. The ``realize`` > function is called with ``Error **`` pointer which should be set if > the device cannot complete its setup. Otherwise on successful > completion of the ``realize`` method the device object is added to the > QOM tree and made visible to the guest. > > -The reverse function is ``unrealize`` and should be were clean-up > +The reverse function is ``unrealize`` and should be where clean-up > code lives to tidy up after the system is done with the device. > > All devices can be instantiated by C code, however only some can > > --- > base-commit: e89049b3ba5f1f0468bc0d294173345597514a1b > change-id: 20260520-qom-76537da673b6 > > Best regards,
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <[email protected]> Perhaps this could go via qemu-trivial (cc'ed).
