Hi,

I happen to use 'ninja -C build test to do a (usually) quick sanity test
on patches and changes and whatnot.  An usual run of this target tests
around 327 individual tests with the RISC-V stuff I usually build.

After pulling today's master 'ninja -C build test' is now running a whooping
1366 tests.  Here's an example:


$ ninja -C build -j 9 test
ninja: Entering directory `build'
mkvenv: checking for pygdbmi>=0.11.0.0
mkvenv: installing pygdbmi==0.11.0.0
[2/3] Running all tests
[1-12/1366] (....)
 (....)
[250-260/1366] 🌕 block-qcow2-optional+block-slow - qemu:io-qcow2-014
[250-261/1366] 🌖 block-qcow2-optional+block-slow - qemu:io-qcow2-014
[252-262/1366] 🌒 block-qcow2-optional+block-slow - qemu:io-qcow2-026
(...)

I noticed a lot of these "optional+block-slow" tests being ran now, something 
that
wasn't happening before.

If I use 'make check' I have the results I was having with 'ninja -C build test'
before the recent changes.

I tried to bisect and got to this commit:

commit daf0d008822be3cb14cdb533f7237c3c789bc373 (HEAD)
Author: Daniel P. Berrangé <[email protected]>
Date:   Mon Jan 12 13:01:49 2026 +0000

    iotests: remove redundant meson suite for iotests


From what I can tell this commit triggered (unintended?) stuff that was already 
in the
code.  In other words I am not sure if this commit is actually the culprit, so 
I am
reluctant to even call this a bug.

My question is: should I be using 'ninja test'?  It seems to me that the common 
practice
is to use 'make check' and maybe I've been using an "unsupported" testing 
scheme.


Cheers,
Daniel



Reply via email to