+Paolo/Peter

On 26/5/26 21:45, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
+Richard/Pierrick

On 26/5/26 20:07, Mohammadfaiz Bawa wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2026 at 11:13 PM Peter Maydell <[email protected]> wrote:

On Tue, 26 May 2026 at 17:49, Mohammadfaiz Bawa <[email protected]> wrote:

memory_region_init_ram_device_ptr() requires the target page
size to be finalized, which has not happened during
instance_init. Calling it from tpm_tis_sysbus_initfn() causes
an assertion failure when the device is introspected without
being realized, for example:

   $ qemu-system-aarch64 -device tpm-tis-device,help
   qemu-system-aarch64: ../system/physmem.c:2524:
   qemu_ram_alloc_internal:
   Assertion 'target_page.decided' failed.
   Aborted (core dumped)

I can not reproduce this error, however en macOS this command triggers:

(lldb) bt
* thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = hit program assert
    frame #0: 0x000000019c642388 libsystem_kernel.dylib`__pthread_kill + 8
    frame #1: 0x000000019c67b848 libsystem_pthread.dylib`pthread_kill + 296
    frame #2: 0x000000019c584b50 libsystem_c.dylib`abort + 124
    frame #3: 0x000000019c583d84 libsystem_c.dylib`__assert_rtn + 284
* frame #4: 0x0000000100a3870c qemu-system-aarch64`qemu_mutex_lock_impl.cold.1 at qemu-thread-posix.c:107:5 frame #5: 0x0000000100981e78 qemu-system-aarch64`qemu_mutex_lock_impl(mutex=<unavailable>, file=<unavailable>, line=<unavailable>) at qemu-thread-posix.c:107:5 frame #6: 0x0000000100345d08 qemu-system-aarch64`qemu_mutex_lock_ramlist at physmem.c:1454:5 frame #7: 0x0000000100345ce4 qemu-system-aarch64`ram_block_add(new_block=0x0000000133104f10, errp=0x000000016fdfe650) at physmem.c:2161:5 frame #8: 0x0000000100346c34 qemu-system-aarch64`qemu_ram_alloc_internal(size=16384, max_size=16384, resized=0x0000000000000000, host=0x000000013380c000, ram_flags=1, mr=0x000000013380a910, errp=0x0000000101c37c20) at physmem.c:2540:5 frame #9: 0x00000001003469c8 qemu-system-aarch64`qemu_ram_alloc_from_ptr(size=<unavailable>, host=<unavailable>, mr=<unavailable>, errp=<unavailable>) at physmem.c:2552:12 [artificial] frame #10: 0x000000010033b56c qemu-system-aarch64`memory_region_set_ram_ptr(mr=0x000000013380a910, size=1024, ptr=0x000000013380c000) at memory.c:1664:20 [inlined] frame #11: 0x000000010033b550 qemu-system-aarch64`memory_region_init_ram_device_ptr(mr=0x000000013380a910, owner=<unavailable>, name=<unavailable>, size=1024, ptr=0x000000013380c000) at memory.c:1684:5 frame #12: 0x00000001002ca594 qemu-system-aarch64`tpm_tis_sysbus_initfn(obj=0x0000000133809400) at tpm_tis_sysbus.c:114:5 frame #13: 0x00000001007e8e58 qemu-system-aarch64`object_initialize_with_type(obj=0x0000000133809400, size=5680, type=0x0000000131f4e250) at object.c:504:5 frame #14: 0x00000001007e964c qemu-system-aarch64`object_new_with_type(type=0x0000000131f4e250) at object.c:707:5 frame #15: 0x00000001007e95fc qemu-system-aarch64`object_new_with_class(klass=<unavailable>) at object.c:716:12 [artificial] frame #16: 0x00000001008ca264 qemu-system-aarch64`qmp_device_list_properties(typename="tpm-tis-device", errp=0x000000016fdfe8a0) at qom-qmp-cmds.c:206:11 frame #17: 0x000000010034c7a0 qemu-system-aarch64`qdev_device_help(opts=<unavailable>) at qdev-monitor.c:315:17 frame #18: 0x000000010033179c qemu-system-aarch64`device_help_func(opaque=<unavailable>, opts=<unavailable>, errp=<unavailable>) at vl.c:1209:12 [artificial] frame #19: 0x000000010098aa10 qemu-system-aarch64`qemu_opts_foreach(list=<unavailable>, func=(qemu-system-aarch64`device_help_func at vl.c:1208), opaque=0x0000000000000000, errp=0x0000000000000000) at qemu-option.c:1148:14 frame #20: 0x000000010032d45c qemu-system-aarch64`qemu_process_help_options at vl.c:2642:9 [inlined] frame #21: 0x000000010032d408 qemu-system-aarch64`qemu_init(argc=<unavailable>, argv=0x000000016fdff148) at vl.c:3738:5 frame #22: 0x00000001008dcef8 qemu-system-aarch64`main(argc=<unavailable>, argv=<unavailable>) at main.c:71:5
    frame #23: 0x000000019c2dab98 dyld`start + 6076


Property introspection only calls instance_init, never
realizefn, so moving the memory region setup to realizefn
avoids the crash while keeping the device fully functional
when actually used in a VM.

Move the PPI buffer allocation, memory_region_init_ram_device_ptr()
and the corresponding sysbus_init_mmio() from
tpm_tis_sysbus_initfn() to tpm_tis_sysbus_realizefn(), placing
them just before the existing vmstate_register_ram() call.

Signed-off-by: Mohammadfaiz Bawa <[email protected]>
---
  hw/tpm/tpm_tis_sysbus.c | 13 ++++++-------
  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/tpm/tpm_tis_sysbus.c b/hw/tpm/tpm_tis_sysbus.c
index 6bec30c36f..33fe9e332c 100644
--- a/hw/tpm/tpm_tis_sysbus.c
+++ b/hw/tpm/tpm_tis_sysbus.c
@@ -100,7 +100,6 @@ static void tpm_tis_sysbus_initfn(Object *obj)
  {
      TPMStateSysBus *sbdev = TPM_TIS_SYSBUS(obj);
      TPMState *s = &sbdev->state;
-    size_t host_page_size = qemu_real_host_page_size();

This is asking about the host page size, so why does it wind up
asserting about the target page size not being fixed ?

thanks
-- PMM

The host_page_size line itself doesn't cause the crash -
qemu_real_host_page_size() is safe to call anywhere. It was
moved simply because it has no other consumers in initfn.

The actual crash comes from memory_region_init_ram_device_ptr()
- which calls qemu_ram_alloc_internal(). In there, line 2522
evaluates TARGET_PAGE_SIZE: align = MAX(align, TARGET_PAGE_SIZE);

With CONFIG_DEBUG_TCG, TARGET_PAGE_SIZE expands through
TARGET_PAGE_MASK which contains: assert(target_page.decided)

That's where it blows up: the target page size hasn't been
finalized yet during instance_init.

Thanks
-- Faiz





Reply via email to