Re: [PATCH v5 15/18] target/arm/kvm: Ignore some writable bits that shouldn't be

[Eric Auger]

On 5/27/26 5:54 PM, Khushit Shah wrote:
>
>> On 27 May 2026, at 9:15 PM, Eric Auger <eric.au...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> What would it change anyway, if we detect we have a writable field
>> matching a RESx field, I guess we would continue raising a warning, no?
> At-least for named models we want values for each bit in 
> ID register.
but if a field is RESx why don't you want to overwrite it? Are there
cases where a field is RESx depending on a condition?

Thanks

Eric
>
> Warm Regards,
> Khushit