On 5/24/26 6:32 PM, Jared Rossi wrote:
> 
> 
> On 5/5/26 4:18 PM, Zhuoying Cai wrote:
>> [...]
> 
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int get_key_type(const S390IPLCertificate *cert)
>> +{
>> +    int rc;
>> +    Error *err = NULL;
>> +
>> +    rc = qcrypto_x509_check_ecc_curve_p521(cert->raw, cert->size, &err);
>> +    if (rc == -1) {
>> +        error_report_err(err);
>> +        return -1;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return (rc == 1) ? DIAG_320_VCE_KEYTYPE_ECDSA_P521 :
>> +                       DIAG_320_VCE_KEYTYPE_SELF_DESCRIBING;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int build_vce_header(VCEntry *vce, const S390IPLCertificate *cert, 
>> int idx)
>> +{
>> +    int key_type;
>> +
>> +    vce->vce_hdr.len = cpu_to_be32(sizeof(VCEntryHeader));
>> +    vce->vce_hdr.cert_idx = cpu_to_be16(idx + 1);
>> +    memcpy(vce->vce_hdr.name, cert->name, CERT_NAME_MAX_LEN);
>> +
>> +    key_type = get_key_type(cert);
>> +    if (key_type == -1) {
>> +        return -1;
>> +    }
>> +    vce->vce_hdr.key_type = key_type;
>> +
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int build_vce_data(VCEntry *vce, const S390IPLCertificate *cert)
>> +{
>> +    uint16_t keyid_field_len;
>> +    uint16_t hash_field_len;
>> +    uint32_t cert_field_len;
>> +    uint32_t vce_len;
>> +    int rc;
>> +
>> +    rc = handle_key_id(vce, cert);
>> +    if (rc) {
>> +        return -1;
>> +    }
>> +    keyid_field_len = ROUND_UP(be16_to_cpu(vce->vce_hdr.keyid_len), 4);
> Maybe return the converted length from the handle_* functions, with 0 
> being the
> error condition?
> 
> e.g. (untested)
>      keyid_len = handle_key_id(vce, cert);
>      if (!keyid_len) {
>          return -1;
>      }
> 
> Just a nit, but I think it would improve readability.
> 
>> +
>> +    rc = handle_hash(vce, cert, keyid_field_len);
>> +    if (rc) {
>> +        return -1;
>> +    }
>> +    hash_field_len = ROUND_UP(be16_to_cpu(vce->vce_hdr.hash_len), 4);
>> +
>> +    rc = handle_cert(vce, cert, hash_field_len);
>> +    if (rc || !is_cert_valid(cert)) {
>> +        return -1;
>> +    }
>> +    cert_field_len = ROUND_UP(be32_to_cpu(vce->vce_hdr.cert_len), 4);
>> +
>> +    vce_len = sizeof(VCEntryHeader) + keyid_field_len + hash_field_len + 
>> cert_field_len;
>> +    if (vce_len > be32_to_cpu(vce->vce_hdr.len)) {
>> +        return -1;
>> +    }
> We already used the maximum size when we allocated space for the VCE, so 
> this
> check is redundant I think?
> 
>> +
>> +    vce->vce_hdr.flags |= DIAG_320_VCE_FLAGS_VALID;
>> +
>> +    /* Update vce length to reflect the actual size used by vce */
>> +    vce->vce_hdr.len = cpu_to_be32(vce_len);
>> +
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static VCEntry *diag_320_build_vce(const S390IPLCertificate *cert, int idx)
>> +{
>> +    g_autofree VCEntry *vce = NULL;
>> +    uint32_t vce_max_size;
>> +    int rc;
>> +
>> +    /*
>> +     * Each field of the VCE is word-aligned.
>> +     * Allocate enough space for the largest possible size for this VCE.
>> +     * As the certificate fields (key-id, hash, data) are parsed, the
>> +     * VCE's length field will be updated accordingly.
>> +     */
>> +    vce_max_size = sizeof(VCEntryHeader) +
>> +                   ROUND_UP(CERT_KEY_ID_LEN, 4) +
>> +                   ROUND_UP(CERT_HASH_LEN, 4) +
>> +                   ROUND_UP(cert->der_size, 4);
> In Patch 10, we define MAX_ENTRY_SIZE.  Is that something different than 
> this?
> Let's use the constant here unless there is a specific reason not to.
> 
>> +
>> +    vce = g_malloc0(vce_max_size);
>> +    rc = build_vce_header(vce, cert, idx);
>> +    if (rc) {
>> +        /*
>> +         * Error occurs - VCE does not contain a valid certificate.
>> +         * Bit 0 of the VCE flags is 0 and the VCE length is set.
>> +         */
>> +        vce->vce_hdr.len = cpu_to_be32(VCE_INVALID_LEN);
>> +        goto out;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    vce->vce_hdr.len = cpu_to_be32(vce_max_size);
> It is not obvious later in the code if the VCE length is a true value or a
> place holder for the max size, so MAX_ENTRY_SIZE would help clarify also.
> 
>> +    rc = build_vce_data(vce, cert);
>> +    if (rc) {
>> +        vce->vce_hdr.len = cpu_to_be32(VCE_INVALID_LEN);
>> +    }
>> +
>> +out:
>> +    return g_steal_pointer(&vce);
>> +}
> Actually, I wonder if we might be able to remove the diag_320_build_vce()
> function since it is basically just a wrapper for building the header 
> and data.
> 
> If we introduce the MAX_ENTRY_SIZE constant and allocate memory before 
> calling
> the build functions, I think we can simplify the whole thing.
> 
> See notes below in the loop to build VCEs...
> 
>> +
>> +static int handle_diag320_store_vc(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t addr, uint64_t 
>> r1, uintptr_t ra,
>> +                                   S390IPLCertificateStore *cs)
>> +{
>> +    g_autofree VCBlock *vcb = NULL;
>> +    size_t remaining_space;
>> +    uint16_t first_vc_index;
>> +    uint16_t last_vc_index;
>> +    int cs_start_index;
>> +    int cs_end_index;
>> +    uint32_t in_len;
>> +
>> +    vcb = g_new0(VCBlock, 1);
>> +    if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_read(cpu, addr, r1, vcb, sizeof(*vcb))) {
>> +        s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
>> +        return -1;
>> +    }
> This is only the VCB header, right?  That's all the space is allocated for
> anyway.  I find it confusing, here is my understanding, please correct 
> if wrong:
> 
> We are allocating a VCB and updating the header values, but we never 
> populate
> the VCB's buffer area because each VCE being built has it's own malloc call?
> 
> Meaning when we read/write the VCB it is actually just the header, and 
> the VCEs
> are written independently?
> 
> If that is correct, then we never really build a full VCB right? Could 
> we just
> use the VCBHeader struct here instead to make that clear?
> 
>> +
>> +    in_len = be32_to_cpu(vcb->vcb_hdr.in_len);
>> +    first_vc_index = be16_to_cpu(vcb->vcb_hdr.first_vc_index);
>> +    last_vc_index = be16_to_cpu(vcb->vcb_hdr.last_vc_index);
>> +
>> +    if (in_len % TARGET_PAGE_SIZE != 0) {
>> +        return DIAG_320_RC_INVAL_VCB_LEN;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (first_vc_index > last_vc_index) {
>> +        return DIAG_320_RC_BAD_RANGE;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    vcb->vcb_hdr.out_len = sizeof(VCBlockHeader);
>> +
>> +    /*
>> +     * DIAG 320 subcode 2 expects to query a certificate store that
>> +     * maintains an index origin of 1. However, the S390IPLCertificateStore
>> +     * maintains an index origin of 0. Thus, the indices must be adjusted
>> +     * for correct access into the cert store. A couple of special cases
>> +     * must also be accounted for.
>> +     */
>> +
>> +    /* Both indices are 0; return header with no certs */
>> +    if (first_vc_index == 0 && last_vc_index == 0) {
>> +        goto out;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    /* Normalize indices */
>> +    cs_start_index = (first_vc_index == 0) ? 0 : first_vc_index - 1;
>> +    cs_end_index = last_vc_index - 1;
>> +
>> +    /* Requested range is outside the cert store; return header with no 
>> certs */
>> +    if (cs_start_index >= cs->count || cs_end_index >= cs->count) {
>> +        goto out;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    remaining_space = in_len - sizeof(VCBlockHeader);
>> +
>> +    for (int i = cs_start_index; i <= cs_end_index; i++) {
>> +        VCEntry *vce;
> What about g_autofree VCEntry *vce = g_malloc0(MAX_ENTRY_SIZE);
> 

    vce_max_size = sizeof(VCEntryHeader) +
                   ROUND_UP(CERT_KEY_ID_LEN, 4) +
                   ROUND_UP(CERT_HASH_LEN, 4) +
                   ROUND_UP(cert->der_size, 4);

After thinking about this, I’m not entirely sure, but I think using the
calculated vce_max_size might be a better choice than MAX_ENTRY_SIZE,
since vce_max_size more closely reflects the size of the current VCE.

MAX_ENTRY_SIZE is currently defined as 8192, which is significantly
larger than the size of a single VCB that will be requested in a later
patch. Although we check whether the remaining space is sufficient to
store the VCE, allocating MAX_ENTRY_SIZE for each VCE might be unnecessary?

Just wondering if this makes sense, or if you think we should keep using
MAX_ENTRY_SIZE here?

> Collin already mentioned using g_autofree, but in addition to that if we can
> allocate the memory up front that would allow us to call the build
> functions directly from here e.g. (untested)
> 
>      if (build_vce_header(vce, cert, i) || build_vce_data(vce, cert) {
>          vce->vce_hdr.len = cpu_to_be32(VCE_INVALID_LEN);
>      }
> 
> That would avoid the frees and steal pointer too.
> 
>> +        const S390IPLCertificate *cert = &cs->certs[i];
>> +
>> +        /*
>> +         * Bit 0 of the VCE flags indicates whether the certificate is 
>> valid.
>> +         * The caller of DIAG320 subcode 2 is responsible for verifying that
>> +         * the VCE contains a valid certificate.
>> +         */
>> +        vce = diag_320_build_vce(cert, i);
>> +
>> +        /*
>> +         * If there is no more space to store the cert,
>> +         * set the remaining verification cert count and
>> +         * break early.
>> +         */
>> +        if (remaining_space < vce->vce_hdr.len) {
>> +            vcb->vcb_hdr.remain_ct = cpu_to_be16(last_vc_index - i);
>> +            g_free(vce);
>> +            break;
>> +        }
>> +
>> +        /* Write VCE */
>> +        if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_write(cpu, addr + vcb->vcb_hdr.out_len, r1,
>> +                                    vce, vce->vce_hdr.len)) {
>> +            s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
>> +            g_free(vce);
>> +            return -1;
>> +        }
>> +
>> +        vcb->vcb_hdr.out_len += vce->vce_hdr.len;
>> +        remaining_space -= vce->vce_hdr.len;
>> +        vcb->vcb_hdr.stored_ct++;
>> +
>> +        g_free(vce);
>> +    }
>> +    vcb->vcb_hdr.stored_ct = cpu_to_be16(vcb->vcb_hdr.stored_ct);
>> +
>> +out:
>> +    vcb->vcb_hdr.out_len = cpu_to_be32(vcb->vcb_hdr.out_len);
>> +
>> +    if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_write(cpu, addr, r1, vcb, sizeof(VCBlockHeader))) 
>> {
>> +        s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
>> +        return -1;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return DIAG_320_RC_OK;
>> +}
>> +
>>   QEMU_BUILD_BUG_MSG(sizeof(VCStorageSizeBlock) != VCSSB_MIN_LEN,
>>                      "size of VCStorageSizeBlock is wrong");
>> +QEMU_BUILD_BUG_MSG(sizeof(VCBlock) != 64, "size of VCBlock is wrong");
>> +QEMU_BUILD_BUG_MSG(sizeof(VCEntry) != 128, "size of VCEntry is wrong");
>>   
>>   void handle_diag_320(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t r3, 
>> uintptr_t ra)
>>   {
>> @@ -270,7 +594,8 @@ void handle_diag_320(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, 
>> uint64_t r3, uintptr_t ra)
>>            * for now.
>>            */
>>           uint32_t ism_word0 = cpu_to_be32(DIAG_320_ISM_QUERY_SUBCODES |
>> -                                         DIAG_320_ISM_QUERY_VCSI);
>> +                                         DIAG_320_ISM_QUERY_VCSI |
>> +                                         DIAG_320_ISM_STORE_VC);
>>   
>>           if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_write(cpu, addr, r1, &ism_word0, 
>> sizeof(ism_word0))) {
>>               s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
>> @@ -296,6 +621,18 @@ void handle_diag_320(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, 
>> uint64_t r3, uintptr_t ra)
>>           }
>>           env->regs[r1 + 1] = rc;
>>           break;
>> +    case DIAG_320_SUBC_STORE_VC:
>> +        if (addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK) {
>> +            s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_SPECIFICATION, ra);
>> +            return;
>> +        }
>> +
>> +        rc = handle_diag320_store_vc(cpu, addr, r1, ra, cs);
>> +        if (rc == -1) {
>> +            return;
>> +        }
>> +        env->regs[r1 + 1] = rc;
>> +        break;
>>       default:
>>           env->regs[r1 + 1] = DIAG_320_RC_NOT_SUPPORTED;
>>           break;
> Regards,
> Jared Rossi


Reply via email to