On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 03:25:51PM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
> All ram device regions were turned to be indirectly accessible by commit
> 4a2e242bbb ("memory: Don't use memcpy for ram_device regions"). This leads
> to guest hang on attempt to build 'cuda-samples' as reported by Julia. The
> guest is started by the following command lines, with GH100 GPU card passed
> from the host.
> 
>    host$ lspci | grep GH100
>    0009:01:00.0 3D controller: NVIDIA Corporation GH100 [GH200 120GB / 480GB] 
> (rev a1)
>    host$ /home/sandbox/gavin/qemu.main/build/qemu-system-aarch64            \
>          -machine virt,gic-version=host,ras=on,highmem-mmio-size=4T         \
>          -accel kvm -cpu host -smp cpus=48 -m size=8G                       \
>          -drive file=/home/gavin/sandbox/images/disk.qcow2,if=none,id=d0    \
>          -device virtio-blk-pci,id=vb0,bus=pcie.0,drive=d0,num-queues=4     \
>          -device vfio-pci-nohotplug,host=0009:01:00.0,bus=pcie.1.0
>            :
>    guest$ cd cuda-samples/build
>    guest$ make -j 20 clean
>    guest$ make -j 20
>            :
>    [ 54%] Linking CUDA executable graphMemoryNodes
>    [ 54%] Built target graphMemoryNodes
>    <no more output afterwards, guest becomes frozen here>
> 
>    guest$ qemu-system-aarch64: virtio: bogus descriptor or out of resources
>    [  555.814025] virtio_blk virtio0: [vda] new size: 268435456 512-byte 
> logical blocks (137 GB/128 GiB)
> 
> When the GPU's driver (NVidia open driver) is loaded on guest bootup,
> the memory blocks residing in the PCI BAR#4 of the GH100 GPU card can
> be presented to the guest through memory hot-add. The page cache can
> then be allocated from the hot added memory blocks when cuda-samples
> is being built. Afterwards, the page cache is sent to QEMU's virtio-blk
> device as part of the DMA request, the bounce buffer has to be used to
> accomodate the request as the corresponding memory region (MemoryRegion)
> is an indirectly accessible ram device region in qemu. However, the max
> bounce bufer size is only 4096 bytes by default and that is exhausted
> quickly, leading to a reset on the virtio-blk device and frozen guest
> eventually.
> 
>   QEMU
>   ====
>   virtio_blk_handle_output
>     virtio_blk_handle_vq
>       virtio_blk_get_request
>         virtqueue_pop
>           virtqueue_split_pop
>             virtqueue_map_desc
>               address_space_map
>                 memory_access_is_direct         # Return false
>                   memory_region_supports_direct_access
> 
>   (qemu) info mtree
>   memory-region: pci_bridge_pci
>     0000000000000000-ffffffffffffffff (prio 0, container): pci_bridge_pci
>       0000042000000000-0000043fffffffff (prio 1, i/o): 0009:01:00.0 base BAR 4
>         0000042000000000-0000043fffffffff (prio 0, i/o): 0009:01:00.0 BAR 4
>           0000042000000000-000004379fffffff (prio 0, ramd): 0009:01:00.0 BAR 
> 4 mmaps[0]
> 
> This adds qemu_ram_{copy, move}() and replaces {memcpy, memmove}() with
> them in the ram device memory region accessors, similar to what's done
> in commit 4a2e242bbb so that the issue (MMIO access instructions were
> optimized to SSE instructions) covered by that commit is fixed. This
> makes 'ram_device_mem_ops' redundant, paving the way to revert that
> commit to make ram device region directly accessible again in the next
> patch.
> 
> Reported-by: Julia Graham <[email protected]>
> Suggested-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]>
> Suggested-by: Peter Xu <[email protected]>
> Suggested-by: Richard Henderson <[email protected]>
> Suggested-by: Peter Maydell <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <[email protected]>
> ---
> v3: Documentation for qemu_ram_{copy, move}           (Peter/Michael)
>     Support qemu_ram_move() for overlapped src/dest   (Richard)
>     Use {memcpy, memmove} if step is 16-bytes or more (Michael)
>     Code improvements                                 (Richard/Michael)
> ---
>  hw/remote/vfio-user-obj.c |   4 +-
>  include/system/memory.h   |  32 ++++++-
>  system/physmem.c          | 178 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  3 files changed, 207 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/remote/vfio-user-obj.c b/hw/remote/vfio-user-obj.c
> index 87fa7b6572..97a6c88780 100644
> --- a/hw/remote/vfio-user-obj.c
> +++ b/hw/remote/vfio-user-obj.c
> @@ -375,9 +375,9 @@ static int vfu_object_mr_rw(MemoryRegion *mr, uint8_t 
> *buf, hwaddr offset,
>          ram_ptr = memory_region_get_ram_ptr(mr);
>  
>          if (is_write) {
> -            memcpy((ram_ptr + offset), buf, size);
> +            qemu_ram_copy(ram_ptr + offset, buf, size);
>          } else {
> -            memcpy(buf, (ram_ptr + offset), size);
> +            qemu_ram_copy(buf, ram_ptr + offset, size);
>          }
>  
>          return 0;
> diff --git a/include/system/memory.h b/include/system/memory.h
> index 1417132f6d..84203c312d 100644
> --- a/include/system/memory.h
> +++ b/include/system/memory.h
> @@ -2897,6 +2897,36 @@ void address_space_register_map_client(AddressSpace 
> *as, QEMUBH *bh);
>  void address_space_unregister_map_client(AddressSpace *as, QEMUBH *bh);
>  
>  /* Internal functions, part of the implementation of address_space_read.  */
> +
> +/**
> + * qemu_ram_copy: copy data to ramblock
> + *
> + * @dst: destination where the data is copied to
> + * @src: source where the data is copied from
> + * @n: length of data to be copied
> + *
> + *
> + * Copy @n bytes from @src to @dst with the assumption that @src and @dst
> + * do not overlap. Handles special cases such as uncacheable ramblocks
> + * correctly. Use this for accessing ramblock in response to DMA/VCPU IO,
> + * in preference to memcpy().
> + */
> +void qemu_ram_copy(void *dest, const void *src, size_t n);
> +
> +/**
> + * qemu_ram_move: move data to ramblock
> + *
> + * @dst: destination where the data is moved to
> + * @src: source where the data is moved from
> + * @n: length of data to be moved
> + *
> + * Move @n bytes from @src to @dst with the assumption that @src and @dst
> + * can overlap. Handles special cases such as uncacheable ramblocks
> + * correctly. Use this for accessing ramblock in response to DMA/VCPU IO,
> + * in preference to memmove().
> + */
> +void qemu_ram_move(void *dest, const void *src, size_t n);
> +
>  MemTxResult address_space_read_full(AddressSpace *as, hwaddr addr,
>                                      MemTxAttrs attrs, void *buf, hwaddr len);
>  MemTxResult flatview_read_continue(FlatView *fv, hwaddr addr,
> @@ -2970,7 +3000,7 @@ MemTxResult address_space_read(AddressSpace *as, hwaddr 
> addr,
>              mr = flatview_translate(fv, addr, &addr1, &l, false, attrs);
>              if (len == l && memory_access_is_direct(mr, false, attrs)) {
>                  ptr = qemu_map_ram_ptr(mr->ram_block, addr1);
> -                memcpy(buf, ptr, len);
> +                qemu_ram_copy(buf, ptr, len);
>              } else {
>                  result = flatview_read_continue(fv, addr, attrs, buf, len,
>                                                  addr1, l, mr);
> diff --git a/system/physmem.c b/system/physmem.c
> index 7bcbf87573..45a17cd580 100644
> --- a/system/physmem.c
> +++ b/system/physmem.c
> @@ -3160,6 +3160,177 @@ void memory_region_flush_rom_device(MemoryRegion *mr, 
> hwaddr addr, hwaddr size)
>      invalidate_and_set_dirty(mr, addr, size);
>  }
>  
> +static void qemu_ram_copy_aligned(void *dst, const void *src, size_t n)
> +{
> +    switch (n) {
> +    case 1:
> +        __builtin_memcpy(dst, src, 1);
> +        break;
> +    case 2:
> +        __builtin_memcpy(dst, src, 2);
> +        break;
> +    case 4:
> +        __builtin_memcpy(dst, src, 4);
> +        break;
> +    case 8:
> +        __builtin_memcpy(dst, src, 8);
> +        break;
> +    default:
> +        memcpy(dst, src, n);
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +static void qemu_ram_move_aligned(void *dst, const void *src, size_t n)
> +{
> +    switch (n) {
> +    case 1:
> +        __builtin_memmove(dst, src, 1);
> +        break;
> +    case 2:
> +        __builtin_memmove(dst, src, 2);
> +        break;
> +    case 4:
> +        __builtin_memmove(dst, src, 4);
> +        break;
> +    case 8:
> +        __builtin_memmove(dst, src, 8);
> +        break;
> +    default:
> +        memmove(dst, src, n);
> +    }
> +}

A weird name for this. You call it for both aligned and unaligned.

maybe this is _unsafe and the "unaligned" below is _safe ?




> +
> +static void qemu_ram_copy_unaligned(void *dst, const void *src,
> +                                    size_t n, size_t max_step)
> +{
> +    uintptr_t test, step;
> +
> +    /* Aligned maximal step */
> +    max_step = pow2floor(max_step);
> +
> +    while (n) {
> +        test = (uintptr_t)src | (uintptr_t)dst | n | max_step;
> +        step = test & -test;
> +
> +        switch (step) {
> +        case 1:
> +            qatomic_set((uint8_t *)dst, qatomic_read((uint8_t *)src));
> +            src += 1;
> +            dst += 1;
> +            n -= 1;
> +            break;
> +        case 2:
> +            qatomic_set((uint16_t *)dst, qatomic_read((uint16_t *)src));
> +            src += 2;
> +            dst += 2;
> +            n -= 2;
> +            break;
> +        case 4:
> +            qatomic_set((uint32_t *)dst, qatomic_read((uint32_t *)src));
> +            src += 4;
> +            dst += 4;
> +            n -= 4;
> +            break;
> +        case 8:
> +            qatomic_set((uint64_t *)dst, qatomic_read((uint64_t *)src));
> +            src += 8;
> +            dst += 8;
> +            n -= 8;
> +            break;
> +        default:
> +            memcpy(dst, src, step);
> +            src += step;
> +            dst += step;
> +            n -= step;
> +        }
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +static void qemu_ram_backwards_copy_unaligned(void *dst, const void *src,
> +                                              size_t n, size_t max_step)
> +{
> +    uintptr_t test, step;
> +
> +    /* Aligned maximal step */
> +    max_step = pow2floor(max_step);
> +
> +    /* End of the blocks */
> +    src += n;
> +    dst += n;
> +
> +    while (n) {
> +        test = (uintptr_t)src | (uintptr_t)dst | n | max_step;
> +        step = test & -test;
> +
> +        switch (step) {
> +        case 1:
> +            src -= 1;
> +            dst -= 1;
> +            n -= 1;
> +            qatomic_set((uint8_t *)dst, qatomic_read((uint8_t *)src));
> +            break;
> +        case 2:
> +            src -= 2;
> +            dst -= 2;
> +            n -= 2;
> +            qatomic_set((uint16_t *)dst, qatomic_read((uint16_t *)src));
> +            break;
> +        case 4:
> +            src -= 4;
> +            dst -= 4;
> +            n -= 4;
> +            qatomic_set((uint32_t *)dst, qatomic_read((uint32_t *)src));
> +            break;
> +        case 8:
> +            src -= 8;
> +            dst -= 8;
> +            n -= 8;
> +            qatomic_set((uint64_t *)dst, qatomic_read((uint64_t *)src));
> +            break;
> +        default:
> +            src -= step;
> +            dst -= step;
> +            n -= step;
> +            memmove(dst, src, step);
> +        }
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +/* x86 should work with __builtin_{memcpy, memmove}() for IO access */
> +#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)
> +#define HOST_UNALIGNED_MMIO_OK 1

maybe HOST_UNALIGNED_VECTOR_MMIO_OK ? We also care that vector stores
are safe.

> +#else
> +#define HOST_UNALIGNED_MMIO_OK 0
> +#endif
> +
> +void qemu_ram_copy(void *dst, const void *src, size_t n)
> +{
> +    if (dst == src || n == 0) {
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    if (HOST_UNALIGNED_MMIO_OK) {
> +        qemu_ram_copy_aligned(dst, src, n);
> +    } else {
> +        qemu_ram_copy_unaligned(dst, src, n, 8);
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +void qemu_ram_move(void *dst, const void *src, size_t n)
> +{
> +    if (src == dst || n == 0) {
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    if (HOST_UNALIGNED_MMIO_OK) {
> +        qemu_ram_move_aligned(dst, src, n);
> +    } else if (dst < src) {
> +        qemu_ram_copy_unaligned(dst, src, n, src - dst);
> +    } else {
> +        qemu_ram_backwards_copy_unaligned(dst, src, n, dst - src);
> +    }
> +}
> +
>  int memory_access_size(MemoryRegion *mr, unsigned l, hwaddr addr)
>  {
>      unsigned access_size_max = mr->ops->valid.max_access_size;
> @@ -3272,7 +3443,7 @@ static MemTxResult 
> flatview_write_continue_step(MemTxAttrs attrs,
>          uint8_t *ram_ptr = qemu_ram_ptr_length(mr->ram_block, mr_addr, l,
>                                                 false, true);
>  
> -        memmove(ram_ptr, buf, *l);
> +        qemu_ram_move(ram_ptr, buf, *l);
>          invalidate_and_set_dirty(mr, mr_addr, *l);
>  
>          return MEMTX_OK;
> @@ -3365,7 +3536,7 @@ static MemTxResult 
> flatview_read_continue_step(MemTxAttrs attrs, uint8_t *buf,
>          uint8_t *ram_ptr = qemu_ram_ptr_length(mr->ram_block, mr_addr, l,
>                                                 false, false);
>  
> -        memcpy(buf, ram_ptr, *l);
> +        qemu_ram_copy(buf, ram_ptr, *l);
>  
>          return MEMTX_OK;
>      }
> @@ -3503,8 +3674,7 @@ MemTxResult address_space_write_rom(AddressSpace *as, 
> hwaddr addr,
>              l = memory_access_size(mr, l, addr1);
>          } else {
>              /* ROM/RAM case */
> -            void *ram_ptr = qemu_map_ram_ptr(mr->ram_block, addr1);
> -            memcpy(ram_ptr, buf, l);
> +            qemu_ram_copy(qemu_map_ram_ptr(mr->ram_block, addr1), buf, l);
>              invalidate_and_set_dirty(mr, addr1, l);
>          }
>          len -= l;
> -- 
> 2.54.0


Reply via email to