Am 29.05.26 um 11:46 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
-Exceptions do not remove the need for authors to comply with all other -requirements for contribution. In particular, the "Signed-off-by" -label in a patch submission is a statement that the author takes -responsibility for the entire contents of the patch, including any parts -that were generated or assisted by AI tools or other tools. +.. code-block:: none + + AI-used-for: tests, docs + AI-used-for: code + AI-used-for: code (refactoring) + AI-used-for: code (prototype) + AI-used-for: research + +``AI-used-for`` should not be included for "background" usage such as +autocomplete or obtaining a pre-review of the patch.
So what about using AI for security scanning? So how do we want to treat a patch from a human that is based on an AI report. And if ok, would we then add something like Reported-by: Claude, chatgpt whatever?
