On 6/22/2026 7:51 PM, Ziyang Zhang wrote: > On Mon, 22 Jun 2026 11:04:43 -0700, Pierrick Bouvier wrote: >> That's my point. As long as Lorelei is not a stable tool, we can't >> really integrate the current plugin upstream. However, it's great that >> you posted this as a RFC, as it shows the approach work. > > The main reason for Lorelei's instability is the repeated modifications > to the plugin API. However, this current PATCH indicates that the plugin > is at least stable now. Therefore, Lorelei can become stable very soon. > I will release Lorelei in a few days. >
Sounds good! >> For now, I think the current plugin should stay downstream, until >> Lorelei is officially published and people can take any library and >> compile it with it. Once we have this, it's easy to motivate integrating >> this plugin upstream, as people can do everything themselves. > > Since the current QEMU does not force the guest program to load at a low > address as it did in version 9.0, the callback functionality in the > earlier versions of Lorelei was limited. However, I don't think this is > a major issue. I must first publish Lorelei and integrate the plugin > into the upstream before we can discuss the modifications to the mmap > handler. > > What do you think? > Sure, as soon as we have this publicly available, I would be happy to see this plugin merged also. Corner cases can be be solved later, it doesn't have to support 100% of the libraries that exist in real world. >> >>> Regards, >>> Ziyang >>> >> >
