On Tue, Jun 23, 2026 at 09:42:47AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Tue, 23 Jun 2026 at 09:27, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On 8/6/26 18:05, Peter Maydell wrote: > > > On Mon, 8 Jun 2026 at 16:56, Jason L. Wright' <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> The three methods track different requirements, so I matched > > >> the closest existing pattern for ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1 and left > > >> the others alone. > > > > > > It seems to me that you've added a third thing that's different > > > from either of the ways that we handle existing ID registers > > > with an isar.idregs[] field. > > > > > > I think we need to figure out: > > > > Should we revert the commit until this is figured out > > I don't think it's difficult. Somebody who cares about hvf > should just do it, and submit this patch with whatever the right > approach is. > I'll have another look at it this week. I think we can unify the approaches, but I need to make sure I understand the other registers better (PFR0 and MMFR0).
--Jason Wright
