On 30.06.2026 10:48, Peter Maydell wrote:
The hyperv_find_cpu() function finds a CPU from a CPU index; this is
basically a wrapper around qemu_get_cpu().  It is allowed to fail, in
which case it returns NULL, which its caller handles.  However, it
includes an assertion check which accidentally assumes the CPU
pointer is non-NULL.

We could assert only if cs != NULL, but the assertion here is not
doing anything interesting -- hyperv_vp_index() is a trivial wrapper
returning cs->cpu_index, so this is effectively asserting that
qemu_get_cpu() did what it claims to do, i.e.  returned us the CPU
matching the index we gave it.  qemu_get_cpu() is a simple "iterate
through list and find matching CPU" which is unlikely to be buggy,
and we don't feel the need to sanity-check it in any of our other
many uses of it.  Drop the assertion entirely.

Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/work_items/3568
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <[email protected]>
---
Checked only with make check / check-functional...
---
  hw/hyperv/hyperv.c | 4 +---
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/hyperv/hyperv.c b/hw/hyperv/hyperv.c
index 4d90032785..900ff80213 100644
--- a/hw/hyperv/hyperv.c
+++ b/hw/hyperv/hyperv.c
@@ -237,9 +237,7 @@ struct HvSintRoute {
static CPUState *hyperv_find_vcpu(uint32_t vp_index)
  {
-    CPUState *cs = qemu_get_cpu(vp_index);
-    assert(hyperv_vp_index(cs) == vp_index);
-    return cs;
+    return qemu_get_cpu(vp_index);
  }
/*

Acked-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <[email protected]>

Thanks,
Maciej


Reply via email to