yujun <[email protected]> writes:

> Standard printf has no %ud conversion; glibc treats it as %u followed
> by a literal 'd', so postcopy userfaultfd error messages printed event
> values like "5d" instead of "5".  The same typo existed in two postcopy
> discard trace format strings.
>
> Also rename the misspelled ram_save_iterate_big_wait() trace argument
> milliconds to milliseconds.
>
> Fixes: 00fa4fc85b ("postcopy: Allow registering of fd handler")
> Signed-off-by: yujun <[email protected]>
> ---
>  migration/postcopy-ram.c | 4 ++--
>  migration/trace-events   | 6 +++---
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/migration/postcopy-ram.c b/migration/postcopy-ram.c
> index f5ef93f193..980b938a4c 100644
> --- a/migration/postcopy-ram.c
> +++ b/migration/postcopy-ram.c
> @@ -1368,7 +1368,7 @@ static void *postcopy_ram_fault_thread(void *opaque)
>                  }
>              }
>              if (msg.event != UFFD_EVENT_PAGEFAULT) {
> -                error_report("%s: Read unexpected event %ud from 
> userfaultfd",
> +                error_report("%s: Read unexpected event %u from userfaultfd",
>                               __func__, msg.event);
>                  continue; /* It's not a page fault, shouldn't happen */
>              }
> @@ -1443,7 +1443,7 @@ retry:
>                      }
>                  }
>                  if (msg.event != UFFD_EVENT_PAGEFAULT) {
> -                    error_report("%s: Read unexpected event %ud "
> +                    error_report("%s: Read unexpected event %u "
>                                   "from userfaultfd (shared)",
>                                   __func__, msg.event);
>                      continue; /* It's not a page fault, shouldn't happen */
> diff --git a/migration/trace-events b/migration/trace-events
> index de99d976ab..3b1258c3bf 100644
> --- a/migration/trace-events
> +++ b/migration/trace-events
> @@ -21,14 +21,14 @@ loadvm_postcopy_handle_run(void) ""
>  loadvm_postcopy_handle_resume(void) ""
>  loadvm_postcopy_ram_handle_discard(void) ""
>  loadvm_postcopy_ram_handle_discard_end(void) ""
> -loadvm_postcopy_ram_handle_discard_header(const char *ramid, uint16_t len) 
> "%s: %ud"
> +loadvm_postcopy_ram_handle_discard_header(const char *ramid, uint16_t len) 
> "%s: %u"
>  loadvm_process_command(const char *s, uint16_t len) "com=%s len=%d"
>  loadvm_process_command_ping(uint32_t val) "0x%x"
>  loadvm_approve_switchover(unsigned int switchover_ack_pending_num) 
> "Switchover ack pending num=%u"
>  postcopy_ram_listen_thread_exit(void) ""
>  postcopy_ram_listen_thread_start(void) ""
>  qemu_savevm_send_postcopy_advise(void) ""
> -qemu_savevm_send_postcopy_ram_discard(const char *id, uint16_t len) "%s: %ud"
> +qemu_savevm_send_postcopy_ram_discard(const char *id, uint16_t len) "%s: %u"
>  savevm_command_send(uint16_t command, uint16_t len) "com=0x%x len=%d"
>  savevm_section_start(const char *id, unsigned int section_id) "%s, 
> section_id %u"
>  savevm_section_end(const char *id, unsigned int section_id, int ret) "%s, 
> section_id %u -> %d"
> @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ colo_flush_ram_cache_begin(uint64_t dirty_pages) 
> "dirty_pages %" PRIu64
>  colo_flush_ram_cache_end(void) ""
>  save_xbzrle_page_skipping(void) ""
>  save_xbzrle_page_overflow(void) ""
> -ram_save_iterate_big_wait(uint64_t milliconds, int iterations) "big wait: %" 
> PRIu64 " milliseconds, %d iterations"
> +ram_save_iterate_big_wait(uint64_t milliseconds, int iterations) "big wait: 
> %" PRIu64 " milliseconds, %d iterations"
>  ram_load_start(void) ""
>  ram_load_complete(int ret, uint64_t seq_iter) "exit_code %d seq iteration %" 
> PRIu64
>  ram_write_tracking_ramblock_start(const char *block_id, size_t page_size, 
> void *addr, size_t length) "%s: page_size: %zu addr: %p length: %zu"

Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <[email protected]>

Reply via email to