On Wed, Jul 01, 2026 at 03:03:35PM +0200, Magnus Kulke wrote:
> Processor features are stored in a union containing two "banks":
> 
> union hv_partition_processor_features {
>     uint64_t as_uint[2];
>     struct {
>         uint64_t sse3_support:1;
>         ...
>     }
> }
> 
> get_proc_features() to retrieve the 2nd bank was passing a pointer that
> steps over the whole union (+16B) instead of picking the 2nd bank _in_
> the union. This manifests in mismatching feature bits for the 2nd bank
> and possibly other side-effects caused by writing beyond the union.
> 
> We need to step over the first bank (+8B) by using as_uint64[0/1] to
> correct this behaviour.
> 
> Fixes: 2f6da91e8a ("accel/mshv: store partition proc features")
> Signed-off-by: Magnus Kulke <[email protected]>
> ---
>  accel/mshv/mshv-all.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/accel/mshv/mshv-all.c b/accel/mshv/mshv-all.c
> index 9452504ac2..c8b7f10294 100644
> --- a/accel/mshv/mshv-all.c
> +++ b/accel/mshv/mshv-all.c
> @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ static int get_proc_features(int vm_fd,
>  
>      ret = get_partition_property(vm_fd,
>                                   HV_PARTITION_PROPERTY_PROCESSOR_FEATURES0,
> -                                 features[0].as_uint64);
> +                                 &features->as_uint64[0]);
>      if (ret < 0) {
>          error_report("Failed to get processor features bank 0");
>          return -1;
> @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ static int get_proc_features(int vm_fd,
>  
>      ret = get_partition_property(vm_fd,
>                                   HV_PARTITION_PROPERTY_PROCESSOR_FEATURES1,
> -                                 features[1].as_uint64);
> +                                 &features->as_uint64[1]);
>      if (ret < 0) {
>          error_report("Failed to get processor features bank 1");
>          return -1;
> -- 
> 2.34.1

Reviewed-by: Doru Blânzeanu <[email protected]>

Reply via email to