Sorry, there is a bug in it.
Can you change it to :
|| r->req.cmd.lba + len > s->qdev.max_lba + 1) {
or else the last lba of the device will be flagged as out of range.
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Il 12/07/2012 08:52, Ronnie Sahlberg ha scritto:
>> Improve the tests for the LBA to cover more cases, the new test looks like
>> this
>> if (r->req.cmd.lba > r->req.cmd.lba + len
>> || r->req.cmd.lba + len > s->qdev.max_lba) {
>>
>> For the 16 byte opcodes, the lba is a uint64, so the first check is to make
>> sure that we do not wrap.
>> For example if an opcode would specify the LBA:0xffffffffffffffff and LEN:2
>> then lba+len would wrap to 1.
>>
>> The second part of the test is to verify that ALL requested blocks are
>> available, not just the first one.
>
> Fixed code style for || and applied to scsi-next.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Paolo
>
>> Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <ronniesahlb...@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> hw/scsi-disk.c | 6 ++++--
>> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/scsi-disk.c b/hw/scsi-disk.c
>> index b2f3c0c..40c05de 100644
>> --- a/hw/scsi-disk.c
>> +++ b/hw/scsi-disk.c
>> @@ -1558,7 +1558,8 @@ static int32_t scsi_send_command(SCSIRequest *req,
>> uint8_t *buf)
>> if (r->req.cmd.buf[1] & 0xe0) {
>> goto fail;
>> }
>> - if (r->req.cmd.lba > s->qdev.max_lba) {
>> + if (r->req.cmd.lba > r->req.cmd.lba + len
>> + || r->req.cmd.lba + len > s->qdev.max_lba) {
>> goto illegal_lba;
>> }
>> r->sector = r->req.cmd.lba * (s->qdev.blocksize / 512);
>> @@ -1581,7 +1582,8 @@ static int32_t scsi_send_command(SCSIRequest *req,
>> uint8_t *buf)
>> if (r->req.cmd.buf[1] & 0xe0) {
>> goto fail;
>> }
>> - if (r->req.cmd.lba > s->qdev.max_lba) {
>> + if (r->req.cmd.lba > r->req.cmd.lba + len
>> + || r->req.cmd.lba + len > s->qdev.max_lba) {
>> goto illegal_lba;
>> }
>> r->sector = r->req.cmd.lba * (s->qdev.blocksize / 512);
>>
>
>
