Hi

On Thu, Jul 9, 2026 at 6:02 PM Daniel P. Berrangé <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2026 at 05:54:30PM +0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 9, 2026 at 5:44 PM Peter Maydell <[email protected]> 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 9 Jul 2026 at 14:32, Daniel P. Berrangé <[email protected]> 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jul 09, 2026 at 03:22:05PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > > > > Cc: mainainters for "Overall Audio backends"
> > > > > Peter Maydell <[email protected]> writes:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, 9 Jul 2026 at 12:44, Markus Armbruster <[email protected]> 
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> I stumbled over ARM machine musicpal, PPC machines pegasos1, 
> > > > > >> pegasos2,
> > > > > >> and MIPS machine fuloong2e crashes.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> I run them like this:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> $ qemu-system-aarch64 -M musicpal -nodefaults -S -display none 
> > > > > >> -monitor stdio
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Died when device_set_realized() tried to propagate a "no default 
> > > > > >> audio
> > > > > >> driver available" error to &error_abort.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is this something we want to have be a possibility the devices
> > > > > > have to cope with? Can we have the "ignores all audio data"
> > > > > > backend be always available instead?
> > > > >
> > > > > There's plenty of precedence for /dev/null-like backends.
> > > > >
> > > > > > Otherwise every audio device needs to cope with "there is no
> > > > > > audio backend available" and implement "do nothing with the
> > > > > > audio data" itself.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes.
> > > >
> > > > We've got a bit of tension between "no defaults" and "builtin audio
> > > > devices" here.
> > > >
> > > > Cnosider if I had instead done
> > > >
> > > >   qemu-system-x86_64 -M pc -device ac97 -nodefaults
> > > >
> > > > It is not unreasonable to expect to see an error because you asked
> > > > explicitly for 'ac97'  and forgot to wire up the required audio
> > > > backend, and asked to NOT have any defaults.
> > > >
> > > > But with your 'musicpal' machine example, you never asked for the
> > > > frontend device, so you should be forgiven for also not asking
> > > > for a audio backend.
> > >
> > > Ah, so this is because of -nodefaults, not because QEMU was
> > > somehow built with no audio backends in it.
> > >
> > > > If we guarantee a /dev/null audio backend always exists, we help
> > > > the second case but degrade the first case
> > >
> > > As a possible analogy, for network devices we just warn in
> > > the analogous "device created but no backend wired up":
> > >
> > >  ./build/x86/qemu-system-x86_64 -nodefaults -device e1000 -display none
> > > qemu-system-x86_64: warning: nic e1000.0 has no peer
> > >
> > > and the effective behaviour is that output packets are dropped.
> > >
> > > We could make audio devices do that (which would be basically
> > > equivalent to "if we need an audio backend and we don't have
> > > one, warn and create the null backend").
> > >
> >
> > Note that we don't have a real "null" backend. The "none" backend does
> > mixing/resampling/volume before dropping the audio (its parent is
> > MIXENG_BACKEND). I think it would be worth to add (so one day we can
> > compile qemu without the whole audio/ engine)
>
> Rather than adding "null" backend, IMHO, we should make "none" do
> what its name suggests, by removing the MIGENG_BACKEND from it.
>

It's a bit more complicated, the "none" backend can be used by vnc
(not spice or dbus), and we have the now-deprecated HMP wavcapture
command.

Note, the new "qemu-vnc" server does not mix/resample audio at this
point, it takes the first audio stream instead.

Fwiw, a "null" audio backend would still need to process audio data at
a correct pace.


Reply via email to