Hi On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 12:38 PM Christian Schoenebeck <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tuesday, 21 July 2026 10:25:34 CEST Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > > On 21/7/26 10:06, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 11:58 AM Marc-André Lureau > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > [...] > > >> most of them are "return-type co_annotation fn(..)" > > >> we even have scripts/block-coroutine-wrapper.py that relies and > > >> produce this order.. > > >> a bit late to change the style imho... > > >> > > >> At least, let's not make this a requirement for this series, please > > > > Not a requirement on my side, but if we had to pick a style, > > I'd vote for "attribute before return type". > > Yep, because that's a) the most compiler-friendly option (all compilers allow > it, including MSC) and b) it's the most diff-noise friendly solution (can be > prepended on its own line without touching any of the existing line(s) at > all). >
ok, what should I do? Send a preliminary patch to fix all annotation positions? or just change the position in this patch or series?
