raspi4_modify_dtb() decides whether to add a second memory node above
the 1 GiB peripheral hole by checking info->ram_size -- but that field
is the boot loader's RAM budget for loading the kernel/initrd/dtb
image, itself always capped to at most UPPER_RAM_BASE - vcram_size by
raspi_base_machine_init(). Since that capped value can never exceed
UPPER_RAM_BASE by construction, the condition was never true for any
raspi4b configuration, and the second node was never added: the guest
never saw more than ~1 GiB of its nominal RAM, regardless of the
machine's actual size.

board_ram_size(info->board_id), computed one line above in the same
function, is the value that was actually needed -- the board's real
total RAM, not the boot loader's own budget for where it's allowed to
place the kernel image.

Confirmed via direct measurement inside the guest ("free -h" /
/proc/meminfo) on raspi4b's default 2 GiB configuration, before and
after:

    before: MemTotal:  943524 kB (~921 MiB)
    after:  MemTotal: 1905824 kB (~1861 MiB)

Also verified against two real, unmodified Raspberry Pi OS releases
(Debian 11/Bullseye and Debian 13/Trixie): both now report ~1.8 GiB of
usable RAM instead of ~900 MiB, with clean boots, working SSH, and no
kernel errors on either.

Signed-off-by: Marcelo Manzo <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <[email protected]>
---
 hw/arm/raspi4b.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hw/arm/raspi4b.c b/hw/arm/raspi4b.c
index b92840e1b6..821ddb42ed 100644
--- a/hw/arm/raspi4b.c
+++ b/hw/arm/raspi4b.c
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static void raspi4_modify_dtb(const struct arm_boot_info 
*info, void *fdt)
 
     ram_size = board_ram_size(info->board_id);
 
-    if (info->ram_size > UPPER_RAM_BASE) {
+    if (ram_size > UPPER_RAM_BASE) {
         raspi_add_memory_node(fdt, UPPER_RAM_BASE, ram_size - UPPER_RAM_BASE);
     }
 }
-- 
2.47.1


Reply via email to