Avi Kivity wrote: > >I agree. If the host OS has disabled a feature, it's a fair bet it's done > >that for a reason. > > The reason may not be relevant to the guest.
For most guests the relevant features are those which work correctly and efficiently on the virtual CPU. If the host OS has disabled a feature, most often that's because the feature doesn't work on the specific host CPU model, but not always. It might be emulated well, but probably not efficiently. In some cases, you might want a guest to see features supported by the host CPU which the host OS has disabled, but I imagine those are unusual - it doesn't seem very likely. Can you give an example? They can be enabled explicitly by the -cpuid flag if needed. -- Jamie
