On 8/20/2026 12:10 PM, Alex Bennée wrote: > Pierrick Bouvier <[email protected]> writes: > >> On 8/19/2026 7:30 AM, Alex Bennée wrote: >>> Pierrick Bouvier <[email protected]> writes: >>> >>>> In the next commits, we'll port each architecture from Makefile to >>>> meson, and it's easier to review those changes if we remove Makefiles >>>> step by step. >>>> >>>> Tested-by: Aniket Sahu <[email protected]> >>>> Signed-off-by: Pierrick Bouvier <[email protected]> >>> >>> Acked-by: Alex Bennée <[email protected]> >>> >> >> It seems like you are the official maintainer for >> tests/tcg/Makefile.target, thus I'm not sure what is the Acked-by >> semantic for a component you "own". > > It means go ahead, I've acknowledged I've seen it although not looked > too closely. Generally when a maintainer acks something they trust the > poster taking it forward via their tree/pr. >
That's why I'm confused. In this case, I expect you will be the one sending PR for current series, as you maintain tcg tests in general. It can't be me, the poster, as I don't have any authority on this subsystem. This series will have to go at once, we can't delegate all architectures bits to sub maintainers. > Given its a temp patch for the migration I don't think you need worry > about having more review on it. > In my mind, it was expected (ideally) to have a reviewed-by on all patches before they can be taken to a PR. >> >> Do you expect another change to be able to send a reviewed-by? >> >> Regards, >> Pierrick >
