Hi Fabiano,

On 2026/8/19 22:14, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
Tao Tang <[email protected]> writes:

Add qtest-attrs-test to exercise qtest memory access commands with attrs
on both aarch64 and x86.

The test covers:
- Arm virt,secure=on: scalar and bulk accesses across non-secure,
   secure, and root spaces, plus negative coverage for realm and for
   non-secure accesses into secure-only RAM
- x86 q35: normal accesses
- libqtest-single *_attrs shortcut wrappers

Add reusable response assertion helpers and structured attrs failure
helpers to libqtest.
Can't you re-order patch 3/5 before 2/5 and put these generic changes in
2/5 as well?

Yes, that makes sense. I'll reorder them in V6.



Use the structured APIs for negative memory access
tests, while retaining raw protocol commands for malformed command
shapes that the typed APIs cannot express.

On Arm, the test targets the virt machine's secure-only RAM window so
that the requested attrs must select the correct address space.

Also wire qtest-attrs-test into the aarch64 and i386/x86_64 qtest
builds.

Signed-off-by: Tao Tang <[email protected]>
---
  tests/qtest/libqtest.c         | 156 +++++++++++++++++
  tests/qtest/libqtest.h         | 111 ++++++++++++
  tests/qtest/meson.build        |   7 +-
  tests/qtest/qtest-attrs-test.c | 305 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  4 files changed, 577 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
  create mode 100644 tests/qtest/qtest-attrs-test.c

diff --git a/tests/qtest/libqtest.c b/tests/qtest/libqtest.c
index 37aa69e1297..533b6f34599 100644
--- a/tests/qtest/libqtest.c
+++ b/tests/qtest/libqtest.c
The repetition introduced in this part is annoying, but let's not suffer
because of it, we can clean it up later. We could probably unify the
attrs and non-attrs versions using variadic functions as with the qmp
helpers.

Agreed. I'll leave the cleanup for a follow-up and keep this version focused on the attrs support.

Thanks for the review!

Tao


For libqtest:
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <[email protected]>


Reply via email to