On 9/17/07, Andreas Färber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Am 17.09.2007 um 14:18 schrieb Christian MICHON: > > > On 9/17/07, Philip Boulain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>>> DON'T DO THIS KIND OF COMMIT AGAIN, PLEASE. > >>>>> if we were using git (but you can do it locally anyway), you > >>>>> would not > >>>>> have these conflicts problems... > >>>> Maybe... but Savannah uses a CVS frontend, as far as I know... > >>> Those are excuses. > >> > >> So is a "you should have used X" argument. It doesn't invalidate the > >> point that the commit was disruptive, and merely acts as bait for the > >> grand old "version repository" flamewar.* > >> > > > > since I mentionned "you should have used Git", I'll repeat: > > this commit was not disruptive to any of the Git users, and will > > never be. > > > > Evolve, or prepare to be assimilated into the Collective... > > Both the qemu.org and the Savannah project page only mention CVS. If > there are better ways to get the code then inform your users how to > use that.
http://brick.kernel.dk/git/?p=qemu.git;a=summary It's tracking QEMU CVS; you're right that it's not mentioned anywhere on the site (AFAICS). You can also DIY with git-cvsimport; see e.g. http://chneukirchen.org/blog/archive/2006/04/tracking-the-ruby-cvs-with-git.html Luca
