Il 26/07/2012 17:26, Kevin Wolf ha scritto: >> The DeviceNotActive error is not a particularly good match, add >> > a separate one. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> > Luiz, what do you think about this one? It seems to contradict the idea > of having only few error classes and free form error descriptions.
I agree, but that's what we have to live with for now... > What's the error class that we should really have here? A general > QERR_NOT_ACTIVE? See my proposal here: http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-07/msg00061.html (totally ignored ;)). This would be QERR_INVALID_STATE (quoting from that message: "InvalidStateError is generally caused by the interaction with other commands, could be fixed by sending some commands and retrying"). Paolo
