On Wed, 23 Sep 2026 22:48:10 +0800, Stanley Jhu <[email protected]> wrote: > diff --git a/hw/ufs/ufs.c b/hw/ufs/ufs.c > index adae6639e16..4d8c641b078 100644 > --- a/hw/ufs/ufs.c > +++ b/hw/ufs/ufs.c > @@ -970,6 +982,45 @@ static void ufs_mcq_process_db(UfsHc *u, uint8_t qid, > uint32_t db) > [ ... skip 31 lines ... ] > + (le32_to_cpu(req->utrd.header.dword_2) & ~UFS_MASK_OCS) | > + UFS_OCS_ABORTED); > + req->state = UFS_REQUEST_COMPLETE; > + QTAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&sq->cq->req_list, req, entry); > + ufs_mcq_process_cq(sq->cq); > + }
RTC = 0 reports successful cleanup, whereas a missing task must be reported with RTC = 1. If no request matches the nexus from SQCTI, this path posts no OCS = ABORTED CQE but still sets CUS = 1 and RTC = 0. Please report RTC = 1 for this path. -- Jeuk Kim <[email protected]>
