This patch series improves the performance of read/write/erase operations
on sdcards.

This is done by increasing the maximum buffer size that is worked on.
>From 1 byte (master) to 512 bytes (commit 1-3) to larger than 512
(adma commit).

Testing on my system with fio I see the following rough performance
values in MiB/s.

              read write readwrite
       master:   6     6     3/  3
 first commit:  51    43    23/ 23
second commit: 392   180   144/143

Tested on a 2GiB raw image with:
  fio --filename=/dev/mmcblk0 --direct=1 --runtime=60 --time_based --bs=128k 
--rw={mode}

The adma values are somewhat unstable but always >100MiB/s, I'm not sure
why but I guess it has something to do with the host side caching.

The fifth commit fixes the DATA_STAT_AFTER_ERASE bit in SCR and
introduces an option to allow to erase blocks to 0x00.

The sixth commit optimizes block erase when erase-blocks-as-zero=true
is used, by passing the zeroing request down the to the block device.
Erasing 2GiB now takes 0.1s instead of 26s.

Signed-off-by: Christian Speich <[email protected]>

I'm picking up this series with the changes indicated in v5 below. Please let
me know how I could improve attribution to Christian in case I missed something.

The last two patches are new and are small cleanups.

---
Changes in v5:
- Rebase onto master
- Split patch "hw/sd/sd: Use multi-byte/block writes for block path" into three
  (first three patches)
- Use sd_blk_{read,write} with additional parameter directly rather than having
  sd_blk_{read,write}_bounce_buffer
- Drive limits and write protect groups are preserved to be checked on block
  boundaries only since these checks are redundant in case the SD host
  transfers one byte at a time.
- WP_VIOLATION is only raised once the first protected block shall be written,
  rather than immediately at the beginning of a multiple block write which
  starts with allowed blocks.
- An off-by-one error has been fixed in the same case where one bye too less
  had been written if a write protected block had been detected.
- There are only two rather than three code paths each handling the multiple
  block optimization.

Changes in v4:
- Rebase onto master, no changes needed.
- Renames:
  - sd_blk_{read,write} -> sd_blk_{read,write}_bounce_buffer
  - sd_blk_{read,write}_direct -> sd_blk_{read,write}
  - to_erase -> erase_len
- Extract erase logic into sd_blk_erase helper
- Enable erase-blocks-as-zero by default. Add compat for 11.0 and below
  to keep it disabled.
- Add cleanup commit to update trace events.
- Link to v3: 
https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/[email protected]

Changes in v3:
- Rebase onto master, updating read/write path for newly added RBMP
- Split up commit 1 into multiple commits
  - change interface to allow "short" read/writes that are continued
    by the core later by calling again
- Link to v2: 
https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/[email protected]

Changes in v2:
- Properly set DATA_STAT_AFTER_ERASE in SCR
- Add erase-blocks-as-zero option to allow the user to switch between
  0x00 and 0xFF for erased blocks.
- Link to v1: 
https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/[email protected]

Bernhard Beschow (5):
  hw/sd/sd: Transfer up to one block in case of multi-block commands
  hw/sd/sd: Add buffer argument to sd_blk_{read,write}
  hw/sd/sd: Use multi-byte/block writes for block path
  hw/sd/sd: Retype state attribute to SDCardStates
  hw/sd/sd: Remove unneeded forward declaration

Christian Speich (3):
  hw/sd/sdhci: Don't use bounce buffer for ADMA
  hw/sd/sd: Add erase-blocks-as-zero option.
  hw/sd/sd: Optimize erase blocks as zero.

 hw/core/machine.c |   1 +
 hw/sd/sd.c        | 230 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 hw/sd/sdhci.c     | 102 ++++++++++----------
 3 files changed, 225 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-)

-- 
2.56.0


Reply via email to