On Tue, Oct 06, 2026 at 06:19:29PM +0300, Andrey Drobyshev wrote:
> On 10/6/26 5:14 PM, Peter Xu wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 06, 2026 at 04:58:39PM +0300, Andrey Drobyshev wrote:
> >> A device may take over a resource from the source in post_load(), e.g.
> >> vhost-vsock acquires the device ownership on a CPR target.  If the
> >> incoming migration fails afterwards, there's currently no way for the
> >> device to give that resource back before the source is told about the
> >> failure, over the return path or via the MIGRATION event, and resumes,
> >> or before the target exits.
> >>
> >> Add a notifier list for that, called from the failure path of
> >> process_incoming_migration_co() before the failure is published.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Andrey Drobyshev <[email protected]>
> > 
> > Should we better reuse migration_state_notifiers[] and introduce
> > MIG_EVENT_INCOMING_FAILED?
> So far I can't see why this wouldn't work.  Should be functionally
> identical to what I've done in this and subsequent patches.  So if you
> think adding a separate event is cleaner - I can certainly go this way.

Yes I think it's cleaner.

Not only because I want to reduce possible global list of notifies only to
be used in migration (we still have another global notifier for postcopy
that only vhost-user uses..), but also in this case you didn't introduce
per-mode notifiers, stop matching with what the source notifiers can do.

When reused, it should then only register it against CPR_TRANSFER|CPR_EXEC,
IIUC.

Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu


Reply via email to