On Fri, 23 Oct 2026 17:01:34 +0900, Daejun Park wrote:
> All three new tests use mcq_test_opts, and UFS_FAULT_INJECT_TAG_ANY is
> used only with ssu-timeout. To see what is covered, I removed each of
> the following on top of the series. Each build succeeded, and the UFS
> qtests still passed 29/29:
>
> - the legacy half of the abort-success branch in ufs_fault_inject_tmr()
>   (2/8)
> - the READ_10/WRITE_10 match for TAG_ANY in ufs_fault_inject_exec_req()
>   (1/8)
> - the body of ufs_fault_inject_sq_cleanup() (2/8)
>
> Could the fault injection cases also run with io_test_opts, and could
> one case cover TAG_ANY with a READ(10) below and above
> UFS_FAULT_INJECT_MIN_LBA?

Done.

> Minor:
>
> - 7/8 and 8/8 drop G_GNUC_UNUSED but keep the old continuation indent
>   of ufs_send_tmr() and ufs_mcq_send_scsi_cmd_async()
>   (tests/qtest/ufs-test.c:1903-1905 and 1932 after the series). If each
>   helper is added in the patch that first uses it, 5/8 does not need
>   G_GNUC_UNUSED.
> - 6/8, tests/qtest/ufs-test.c:2014: the comment says the queue
>   status/pointers "remain 0" after HCE=1, but only the HCE bit is
>   checked after it.

Fixed the continuation indentation of both helpers. We kept the helpers
in patch 5/8 with G_GNUC_UNUSED so patch 5/8 stays a self-contained
preparation patch.

Done.

Thanks,
Stanley

Reply via email to