Hi

On Fri, Oct 23, 2026 at 2:04 PM Daniel P. Berrangé <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2026 at 02:46:11PM +0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > PciDevfn is a bit special, since it accepts integer and string as
> > setter, but only output integer as getter.
> >
> > Unfortunately, we can't declare an alternate str|int QAPI type for it,
> > since: branch 'string' can't be distinguished from 'integer'
> >
> > Rather than declaring it as "str", use the common type instead.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  hw/core/qdev-properties-system.c | 3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/core/qdev-properties-system.c 
> > b/hw/core/qdev-properties-system.c
> > index 5bfdfe1ab9d9..3381de1144d6 100644
> > --- a/hw/core/qdev-properties-system.c
> > +++ b/hw/core/qdev-properties-system.c
> > @@ -904,7 +904,8 @@ static char *print_pci_devfn(Object *obj, const 
> > Property *prop)
> >  }
> >
> >  const PropertyInfo qdev_prop_pci_devfn = {
> > -    .type  = "str",
> > +    /* The formatted string accepted by the setter is a CLI convenience. */
>
> IIUC, this is not limited to the CLI, it will work anywhere the JSON
> syntax is permitted which is both CLI and QMP.
>
> libvirt uses this string syntax:
>
>   -device 
> '{"driver":"pcie-root-port","port":9,"chassis":2,"id":"pci.2","bus":"pcie.0","multifunction":true,"addr":"0x1.0x1"}'
>  \
>
> > +    .type  = "int32",
> >      .description = "Slot and optional function number, example: 06.0 or 
> > 06",
>
>
> Changing the type to 'int32', where 99% of usage is input only
> and string based, is pretty unpleasant. Even more so that the
> description doesn't even mention encoding dev+function as an
> integer.

This is purely a metadata change, the setter still accepts both str &
int, so I don't think this change blocks this series. But I agree we
could do better.

There are multiple options. We could keep declaring the property as
str instead. In this case, the getter should probably return a string
for consistency and correctness. This might surprise some existing
users though.

We could introduce new properties like `devfn-str` and `devfn-int`
that alias the same value.

We could also introduce a new structured QAPI type.

Markus, what's your take?

thanks

>
> >      .print = print_pci_devfn,
> >      .get   = qdev_propinfo_get_int32,
>
> With regards,
> Daniel
> --
> |: https://berrange.com       ~~        https://hachyderm.io/@berrange :|
> |: https://libvirt.org          ~~          https://entangle-photo.org :|
> |: https://pixelfed.art/berrange   ~~    https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
>


Reply via email to