On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 02:06:10PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2012-08-13 10:35, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > From: Nicholas Bellinger <n...@linux-iscsi.org> > > > > This is required to get past the following assert with: > > > > commit 1523ed9e1d46b0b54540049d491475ccac7e6421 > > Author: Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com> > > Date: Thu May 17 10:32:39 2012 -0300 > > > > virtio/vhost: Add support for KVM in-kernel MSI injection > > > > Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com> > > Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> > > Cc: Anthony Liguori <aligu...@us.ibm.com> > > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <n...@linux-iscsi.org> > > --- > > hw/msix.c | 3 +++ > > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/hw/msix.c b/hw/msix.c > > index 800fc32..c1e6dc3 100644 > > --- a/hw/msix.c > > +++ b/hw/msix.c > > @@ -544,6 +544,9 @@ void msix_unset_vector_notifiers(PCIDevice *dev) > > { > > int vector; > > > > + if (!dev->msix_vector_use_notifier && > > !dev->msix_vector_release_notifier) > > + return; > > + > > assert(dev->msix_vector_use_notifier && > > dev->msix_vector_release_notifier); > > > > > > I think to remember pointing out that there is a bug somewhere in the > reset code which deactivates a non-active vhost instance, no? > > Jan
Could not find it. Could you dig it up pls? > -- > Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SDP-DE > Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux