On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 05:23:49PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2012-08-22 12:19, BALATON Zoltan wrote: > > On Wed, 22 Aug 2012, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >> This is a rather big patch. I strongly suspect you can break it up into > >> smaller pieces that address separate aspects one-by-one. Also, it is > >> definitely to heavy for "qemu-trivial". > > > > Despite its size the changes included are fairly simple but I can try to > > break it up. I've sent it to qemu-trivial because it may meet the "Do > > not fall under an actively maintained subsystem." > > But that doesn't make it trivial, rather harder (if no one reviewed it). > > > category as I've found > > no maintainer for this part. Should I send the revisions only to > > qemu-devel then? > > Yes, that's more appropriate IMHO.
Yes, thanks. I don't know how this device is supposed to work and the patch isn't trivial, so I can't apply this to qemu-trivial. Stefan